# Natural Convection - Problem in achieving converged solution

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 21, 2013, 23:05 Natural Convection - Problem in achieving converged solution #1 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 4 Hi People, I have some enquries regarding natural convection simulation for my final year project. Basically, I am now doing a validation study by making comparison with the experimental study using my computational study. This experimental study will have a simple enclosed cylindrical duct with a temperature difference at both sides of the duct. A high temperature and a low temperature will be fixed at both ends of the ducts. The circumferential face will be assigned to be adiabatic (assuming face is well insulated). This will induce a natural convection within the duct. I am using ANSYS Workbench to generate my mesh only for the fluid domain. I am using 'inflation' method to create the boundary layer mesh. Thus, I am using the y+ value in the order of 1 to calculate the y value as I will be using the first layer thickness in the ANSYS Mesh with 20 layers and the growth rate of 1.2. For the rest of the mesh, I am using the tetra mesh with the element size of 10mm. As for the boundary condition, I am setting a fixed temperature at both ends (82 and 14 degree celsius) of the duct and the circumferential face as adiabatic. Fluid used will be distilled water with the operating temperature of 25 degree celsius. Since the temperature difference at both ends is not large, I am applying Bossinesq theory to calculate the buoyancy effect, thus the operating density need not be stated. SIMPLE Scheme and First order Scheme are used initially achieve convergence first. Since the boundary condition will lead to turbulent natural convection, it is adviced from the following link to reduce the order of Ra number by 2 first. http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...ug/node572.htm I did not apply turbulence model for the first run since the Ra number is in the order of magnitude of 10e7. I started with this but I could not get the a converge solution especially for continuity. I have tried to toggle around with the relaxation factors by reducing the body force and momentum and when it gets converged, i slowly increase the relaxation value again. I still have difficulty getting the solution converged. Do you have any advice for this? Thank you so much for your time and advice.

 August 28, 2013, 10:45 #2 New Member   Yogesh Patil Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 20 Rep Power: 7 Did you try using 0.7 for pressure and 0.3 for momentum?

 August 28, 2013, 10:51 #3 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 4 Thank you for your reply! I have not tried that. I only reduce the default value by 0.1 for each controls. May I know the reason for using 0.7 for pressure and 0.3 for momentum?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post flow_CH FLUENT 7 July 31, 2013 00:40 claudia.h FLUENT 2 July 3, 2012 03:10 Nav CFX 13 June 6, 2011 07:37 rahulsharma FLUENT 0 January 25, 2010 02:16 Se-Hee CFX 2 June 10, 2007 06:29

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33.