CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   FLUENT (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/)
-   -   Convergence problem (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/122799-convergence-problem.html)

star August 28, 2013 09:36

Convergence problem
 
Hi friends. I am simulating flow over 2d airfoil at Reynold number of 1000. Flow is laminar and steady state. I run with two different pressure schemes. First I used PRESTO Pressure scheme and 2nd order upwind and the residual became stable (very small oscillations) at 10e-6 and were not decreasing any more. I was monitoring CL and was constantly decreasing with a very minor change.
Then I restarted the whole process with 2nd order Pressure scheme and the solution converged but the result is over predicted from experimental. I know this is steady state case and not transient and my mesh quality, skewness, and Angle is also fine.
Anyone know where is the problem? Thanks in advance

flotus1 August 28, 2013 10:34

Why do you thing that this is a problem with convergence? You say that both simulations converge:confused:

How high is the error between experiment and simulation?

star August 28, 2013 10:51

Thanks Alex for your response. The correct CL is about 0.1634 (at 3 degree angle of attack) but i got 0.167 with 2nd order pressure and momentum schemes. My value was lower when i used coarser mesh but with refining it become over predected. I think it should be equal or less than correct value. When I changed pressure scheme to PRESTO, i got about 0.1620 but not totally stable, it still decreasing (very minor change 0.1% decrease in 1000 iterations) but residuals not decreasing. I run through about 32000 iterations. What do you say about this?

flotus1 August 28, 2013 13:41

I say that a mismatch of 2.2% between experiment and simulation is very good.
Unless you know for certain that the error of the measurement is lower than those 2.2%, there is no reason in pushing the simulation towards the "exact" measurement value.

star August 28, 2013 23:20

Actually I am doing grid validation at angle of attack 3 degree. one of my friend did the same case and he got almost the same result to the actual (He is not here). I wonder why with two different pressure schemes result is different. In my opinion, using PRESTO pressure scheme the result looks ok but the residuals become stable as i told before so i don't think this is correct.

star August 29, 2013 04:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by star (Post 448550)
Thanks Alex for your response. The correct CL is about 0.1634 (at 3 degree angle of attack) but i got 0.167 with 2nd order pressure and momentum schemes. My value was lower when i used coarser mesh but with refining it become over predected. I think it should be equal or less than correct value. When I changed pressure scheme to PRESTO, i got about 0.1620 but not totally stable, it still decreasing (very minor change 0.1% decrease in 1000 iterations) but residuals not decreasing. I run through about 32000 iterations. What do you say about this?

Oh i am sorry i came to know that i had made a small mistake with using 2nd order pressure scheme that's why i got a little over predected CL, I corrected it and now it's in process.. :p.. but the problem with using PRESTO scheme is still there.

Centurion2011 September 4, 2013 05:34

try here


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:03.