CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Simulation of 0021 airfoil at 120,000 Reynolds number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 24, 2013, 23:05
Default Simulation of 0021 airfoil at 120,000 Reynolds number
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4
AUCH is on a distinguished road
I have been trying to simulate the 0021 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 120,000. The Reynolds number is transitional and according to the experiments, there is a clear plateau in the pressure coefficients. This indicates the presence of the separation bubble and hence transition.
I used the transition SST model to capture the transition. My wall y+ was under 1. With an O-grid topology, the farfield is approximately 20 chord lengths from the airfoil. The velocity inlet and pressure outlet boundary conditions were used. The turbulence specification method was set to Intermittency, k and omega. The values were specified such that the turbulence intensity in the vicinity of the airfoil was around 0.8% (as per the experiments). The gauge pressure at the pressure outlet was kept zero.
I also did a mesh independence study at an angle of 4 degs at steady state conditions and found that 250k elements (880x284) were suitable for the 2D simulation. I have conducted steady state and transient simulations.
What I found was that the bubble was captured fairly accurately for both steady state and transient simulation. Furthermore, there were no problems in convergence for any case. For convergence I monitored the lift and drag coefficients as well as the residuals.
The main problem is that the lift is highly underpredicted as compared to the experimental value at 8 degs. As far as I understand, the peak suction pressure at the leading edge is not captured accurately and is consistently underpredicted. This leads to the smaller lift values. I found that if we specify the correct N_crit value in XFOIL, the results were approximately the same as that of the CFD. Both underpredict the leading edge suction pressure and hence the lift. Also the XFOIL results are slightly more accurate as compared to the CFD results.

I have also tried three dimensional simulations using the SST model but the lift is still underpredicted.

Any help in getting improved lift predictions would be highly appreciated.

AUCH is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NACA0012 airfoil Critical reynolds number kianoosh_py Main CFD Forum 18 January 14, 2014 10:51
Stable boundaries marcoymarc CFX 33 March 13, 2013 07:39
ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. smnaryal CFX 7 January 3, 2013 19:09
CFX Solver Reynolds Number haider760 CFX 2 March 4, 2012 23:05
Reynolds number in 2D simulation Wotild Main CFD Forum 7 November 10, 2010 09:15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22.