CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Appearance of species in cells when using F cycle

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 29, 2016, 09:04
Default Appearance of species in cells when using F cycle
  #1
New Member
 
Jack
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13
madfan123 is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I consider the gas flow in a pipe which in one place is connected with small channel system. Since I am considering only gas dynamics, all regions in the model are fluid and all walls are adiabatic. At some time in the inlet pipe the oxygen begins to be supplied, which propagates through the pipe and after some time begins to flow into the channels. During calculation process, when oxygen has not yet been entered into the channels in some areas of it (in the corners, where the computational grid is reduced) some elements themselves begin to emit the oxygen and become his source. At once after oxygen appears at pipe inlet it appears at many zones in model but with very low concentration (1e-20…1e-10) although it hasn’t reach these regions physically. If I turn off F cycle, concentration in these zones is 0 like it has to be.

Mesh is polyhedral
(minimal orthogonal quality is 0.25 and maximum skewness is 0.75). Everywhere there are prismatic layers to resolve the boundary layer. Solver is coupled. Time step is 1e-3...1e-4 [s].

Does somebody know
why this numerical problem appears and how to avoid it do not turn off F cycle?

Thanks in advance
madfan123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 2016, 09:40
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Isn't that normal? This isn't an issue related to the F cycle either.

The problem with transport equations (advection-diffusion equations and all diffusion equations) is that they do permit solutions with long-range diffusion that you wouldn't find physically. Transport equations are inconsistent with special relativity after all.

The other thing is numerical diffusion, which significantly enhances the physical diffusion. This is where you need high quality grids and high order discretization schemes to limit the influence of numerical diffusion.

Diffusion rate is proportional to gradients, so if you suddenly add oxygen at the inlet when there was no oxygen there before then you've applied an infinite gradient.
CeesH likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2016, 02:42
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Jack
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13
madfan123 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for good explanation. But anyway is it possible to avoid this problem, because it has significant influence on the results?
madfan123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops avinashjagdale OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 53 March 8, 2019 09:42
decomposePar -allRegions stru OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 2 August 25, 2015 03:58
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh matches wrong cells to CellZone Siegunn OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 4 July 31, 2015 05:10
reaction in particular cells wlt_1985 FLUENT 0 April 11, 2011 01:41
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 27, 2011 21:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:46.