CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

FSI including flow induced vibrations in porous models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 9, 2013, 08:32
Default FSI including flow induced vibrations in porous models
  #1
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 10
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Hi

I was wondering if anyone here has any experience of modelling flow induced vibrations and the corresponding FSI in filtration equipments in the pipelines. Few of the contributing factors that I see can be:

1) Flow pulsation due to compressor in the vicinity in the pipeline
2) Vortex shedding at strainer pores (perforated sheets)
3) Acoustic characteristics due to incoming flow and the inherent design of the equipment
4) Transient phenomena because of the intricate cavities/recirculation etc in the equipment.

While incorporating the relevant contributing factors from the ones listed above will be difficult enough as it is, the situation will be more convoluted when there are porous interfaces/regions in the equipment.



Thanks
OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2013, 08:34
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 10
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
On the same topic, I have found an interesting paper:

Y Khulief, M. A. Habib, S. A. M. Said, R Ben-Mansour, H. M. Badr, M Anis, and A.E. Khalifa, Vortex shedding-free strainers, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, Volume 226, Number 2, 2012, Pages 91-104.

But I wonder if anyone has any experience of similar simulations. I was wondering, if all these 4 cases are isolated and if the results are obtained separately to find the peaking frequency in each case would give me anything...

Also, given that strainer will be represented as a porous zone/interface, it will practically smear off the perturbations. In this case, would it be reasonable to trust the transient instabilities obtained by FSI on a full model, with contributions from #1, #3 and #4 taken into account?

Any thoughts around this will give me something...

Thanks!
OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 11, 2013, 09:46
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
Andrey.M. is on a distinguished road
I think you could simulate a small piece of strainer (which, as I assume, consist of many identical parts) in order to observe the Amplitude of such perturbations. Then you will be able to judge whether these values are significant or not. I suppose not. Such perturbations have a very small scale and, in fact, they smooth the flow. Large scale vortexes (which cause significant pressure oscillations) don't go through them.

Is this flow multiphase? If so, why don't you take into account multiphase instabilities? Are you sure that the flow could be considered as homogeneous?
Andrey.M. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 11, 2013, 10:30
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 10
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Andrey,

Thanks for the reply, I knew there wouldn't be many!
Have a look at the schematic of the strainer assembly.



The typical sizes (of diameter) range upto 72" and the conical strainer is made of perforated sheet.

By small portion do you mean the small periodic section of the perforated sheet? The perturbations for such a small section of strainer will have too small lengthscales but I am not sure if it will/won't have significant effect on strainer. Besides, if we only consider the effect of #1, #3, #4 mentioned in the first post and decide to simulate the full filter with strainer modelled as the porous region, neglecting the effect of perforated sheet perturbation (we have to, we can't model all the holes!), we will have the frequency spectrum. Would the peaking frequency and the magnitudes of forces on strainer that be representative of reality?

BTW, The fluids we consider are single phase, and have too low mach nos. so they can be assumed incompressible.

Thanks
OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 11, 2013, 11:28
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
Andrey.M. is on a distinguished road
Yes I meant small periodic section.
I've made a fast look through the article which you mentioned. The Amplitude which represented there looks pretty significant. However the frequency is high, so the question is - would the strainer response to such fluctuations? and would that response be significant?
You could also try to simulate structural behaviour of a strainer under high frequency pressure fluctuations. (not FSI, just transient structural)
Andrey.M. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2013, 05:02
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 10
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
The example given in the article is just representative. In another set of operating conditions/size/compressor frequency etc, you may have different results. So, I wouldn't generalise. That said, the question you posed, is the same I am pondering over. Would the effect of perforated sheet be too significant and is its omission is fair?

Approach of "only structural" simulation will be far from the actual situation, and clients are actually insisting on flow induced phenomena, because this simulates their operating conditions where they see failures.

Thanks
OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2013, 13:16
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
Andrey.M. is on a distinguished road
I didn't mean that structural approach solves your case. If it were performed you could probably assess the significance of the effect.
You can simulate several cases with different frequencys and amplitudes of oscillations (based on articles or your expectations/span of a particular interest/intuition) and see what deformation during the time occurs in the structure. It won't necessarily give you the answer but it may help a lot.
And don't abandon idea of periodic simulation of the strainer piece.
Andrey.M. is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow through porous medium using CFX: lack of convergence Chander CFX 3 July 23, 2014 07:32
Flow meter Design CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 09:33
Simulation of air flow inside valve - FSI? Help! farianka Main CFD Forum 0 April 17, 2011 17:30
Multiphase Porous Media Flow - Convergence Issues VT_Bromley FLUENT 5 March 23, 2011 12:38
Question for modelling flow in porous media legendyxg FLUENT 9 April 21, 2009 23:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48.