CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

The problems of power number calculation in turbulent rushton turbine stirring tank

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 4, 2014, 14:41
Default The problems of power number calculation in turbulent rushton turbine stirring tank
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
I try to simulate stirring tank with rushton turbine. The RNGKE model was selected to simulate the fluid flow in tank. The experimental power number is 0.65. However, the calculated power number is higher than experiment.

Can anyone help me to solve this problems?
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2014, 17:52
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
Can anyone help me?
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2014, 19:56
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 4
jamalf64 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
Can anyone help me?
Please write more details for example: MRF or sliding mesh, second order or first order, baffled or unbaffled tank, ...
How power number is greater than experimental data?
jamalf64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 06:50
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
The unbaffled tank with diameter of 0.19 m is simulated by MRF method. The second order upwind is adopted to estimate the face value. The experimental power number is 0.65, while the simulated power number is about 1.3. The top of the tank is a lid, which prevent the presence of vortex. The impeller is rushton turbine with diameter of 0.095 m. The rotating speed is 200 rpm.
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 07:26
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 4
jamalf64 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
The unbaffled tank with diameter of 0.19 m is simulated by MRF method. The second order upwind is adopted to estimate the face value. The experimental power number is 0.65, while the simulated power number is about 1.3. The top of the tank is a lid, which prevent the presence of vortex. The impeller is rushton turbine with diameter of 0.095 m. The rotating speed is 200 rpm.
If trend of diagrams(for example axial velocity, radial velocity, tangential velocity vs radial coordinate) is acceptable, I think you must refine your mesh.
jamalf64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 09:48
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamalf64 View Post
If trend of diagrams(for example axial velocity, radial velocity, tangential velocity vs radial coordinate) is acceptable, I think you must refine your mesh.
I plot tangential velocity VS radial of tank. The comparison between experiment and simulation are difference with increasing the radius. The model was simulated with the mesh size of 1 mm all of domain.
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 10:39
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
Moreover, I simulated this case with increasing the Swirl Factor of 0.11 (in RNG Options). The simulated tangential velocity and experiment were very similar but the simulated results doesn't smooth (Oscillation). The residual was also oscillation. The residual was higher (about 0.1) than the residual obtained by default Swirl Factor (0.07), (about 0.0001), which give the deviation of tangential velocity at the higher radius.

Can any one help me to solve this problems?
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 10:58
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 4
jamalf64 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
Moreover, I simulated this case with increasing the Swirl Factor of 0.11 (in RNG Options). The simulated tangential velocity and experiment were very similar but the simulated results doesn't smooth (Oscillation). The residual was also oscillation. The residual was higher (about 0.1) than the residual obtained by default Swirl Factor (0.07), (about 0.0001), which give the deviation of tangential velocity at the higher radius.

Can any one help me to solve this problems?
Are you sure that the solution is converged? Do you monitor some parameters (for example area-weighted velocity magnitude in 2 plane: once above impeller and other below impeller)?
see this tutorial: "Modeling Turbulent Flow in a Mixing Tank"
jamalf64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 12:27
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
I do this step as reported in the tutorial. However, these monitors show oscillation. Can anyone suggest me about this problem?
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 12:51
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 4
jamalf64 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
I do this step as reported in the tutorial. However, these monitors show oscillation. Can anyone suggest me about this problem?
Ok, change second order to first order, this cause to solution will be converge and monitors dont show oscillation.If in this step calculated data is wrong, change turbulence model.
I hope this help you
Be success
Jamal
jamalf64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 14:39
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
I'm try as your suggestion but the solution is wrong. However, do you have more suggestion.

Regards
B. Eakarach
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 14:59
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
Eakarach is on a distinguished road
Dear Jamal Foroozesh

Please send me your email. Then, i will send my case file to you.

Thank in advance
Eakarach is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2014, 15:08
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Jamal Foroozesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 4
jamalf64 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
Dear Jamal Foroozesh

Please send me your email. Then, i will send my case file to you.

Thank in advance
Before sending your file try to this:
turbulence: k-e Realizable
impeller wall: moving wall, relative to adjacent cell zone, rotational, speed=0
active gravity
pressure: body force weighted
momentum , and turbulence equation: first order upwind
jamalf64 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2014, 04:43
Default
  #14
New Member
 
jeicek
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 3
jeicek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eakarach View Post
I try to simulate stirring tank with rushton turbine. The RNGKE model was selected to simulate the fluid flow in tank. The experimental power number is 0.65. However, the calculated power number is higher than experiment.

Can anyone help me to solve this problems?
Hello

I am also simulation a CSTR using MRF in openFoam and I need to calculate power number. I do not know how to do this. can anyone help me and ginve an idea?
Thanks in advance
jeicek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2014, 10:26
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 912
Rep Power: 15
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeicek View Post
Hello

I am also simulation a CSTR using MRF in openFoam and I need to calculate power number. I do not know how to do this. can anyone help me and ginve an idea?
Thanks in advance
Hi,
this is the fluent forum, you'd better to write in openfoam forum;
however power number Np is defined by:

Np=P/(N^3*Dt^5*rho)

P=Absorbed power (W)
N=Rotational speed in revolutions per second (rev/s)
Dt=Impeller diameter (m)
rho=Fluid density (kg/m3)

Absorbed power is calculated from simulation, other parameters are known.

Daniele
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2014, 10:15
Default
  #16
New Member
 
jeicek
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 3
jeicek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost82 View Post
Hi,
this is the fluent forum, you'd better to write in openfoam forum;
however power number Np is defined by:

Np=P/(N^3*Dt^5*rho)

P=Absorbed power (W)
N=Rotational speed in revolutions per second (rev/s)
Dt=Impeller diameter (m)
rho=Fluid density (kg/m3)

Absorbed power is calculated from simulation, other parameters are known.

Daniele
Thank you very much for reply Daniele. To be honest I wrote it but no aswer still also here is the thread I created
power number prediction
but any way thank you very much
jeicek is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geometry of Tank and Rushton Turbine in Gambit jawidnaik ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 February 4, 2015 08:28
Compute the power of small wind turbine. Luolin FLUENT 9 May 27, 2013 14:52
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 November 25, 2012 09:54
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02
Problems with Courant number (LaunderGibsonTurbulence Model) sven OpenFOAM 3 August 10, 2009 03:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:26.