CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Does Fluent always need inlet and outlet ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 3, 2014, 10:27
Default Does Fluent always need inlet and outlet ?
  #1
New Member
 
Jochem Grietens
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Belgium
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 3
JochemGrietens is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm simulating a 2D airfoil. I have done my meshing in ICEM end succesfully exported it to fluent. I created an outer boundary called FF(farfield) but i want the flow to hit the airfoil under an angle. So to what type do i set my FF(outer boundary). I tried setting it to "inlet" but this isn't working. So my question is : do i need to specify an inlet and an outlet ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Knipsel.jpg (46.0 KB, 16 views)
JochemGrietens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 10:37
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 915
Rep Power: 15
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Not sure what you are asking specifically; but think about having a domain with only inlet(s); if you set a velocity inlet, for example, without any outlet, your pressure inside the domain will raise till divergence..
So, if you have a inlet, you need also an outlet..

Daniele
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2014, 12:18
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Andrew Kokemoor
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 4
Kokemoor is on a distinguished road
Technically, you can use velocity-inlet conditions to specify a velocity out of the domain, serving as an outlet; I'm guessing this is what you're trying to do. This overspecifies momentum (a subtle problem, but you definitely won't get good drag results) and underspecifies pressure, which is what's giving you the error. Pressure needs to be specified somewhere in the domain, because the NS equations only solve the pressure gradient.

The short answer is to use a pressure-outlet condition, which will solve both of these problems.
Kokemoor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2014, 07:43
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Nick Prendergast
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
neprendo is on a distinguished road
depending on how your simulations go and if you're thinking of doing another aerofoil you might want to consider following this tutorial, its a step by step guide on how to build and mesh an aerofoil in Icem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EknKVAJGEJ8

and the short answer is yes, if you want flow into your system you need flow out of your system and vice versa.
neprendo is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D Hypersonic Inlet in FLUENT - Convergence Issues Fraisdegout FLUENT 5 April 16, 2015 11:12
define BCs at inlet and outlet for natural ventilation simulation jjz2013 Main CFD Forum 0 January 29, 2013 16:50
Pulsatile pressure inlet with pressure outlet a.lynchy FLUENT 3 March 23, 2012 14:45
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet chong chee nan FLUENT 0 December 29, 2001 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24.