|
[Sponsors] |
September 7, 2014, 18:06 |
Problem with airfoil analysis
|
#1 |
New Member
Abhinav Pandey
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11 |
Can anyone tell me what could be the possible reason that I am getting static pressure contour as in the attached pic?
I have meshed the domain in ICEM and imported it into fluent. Here are the parameters that I have used- Re-1.4e05 alpha= 6 degrees airfoil= GOE 233 Model is SST K-omega Turbulent intensity= 5 Viscosity ratio=10 y+ = 1 |
|
September 8, 2014, 04:39 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
In your opinion, what is wrong with the pressure contour?
|
|
September 8, 2014, 05:07 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Abhinav Pandey
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11 |
Well, away from the airfoil, that is at far field, pressure should be same everywhere, not affected by the obstacle. But it is varying since that contour line is spreading to the far field.
Also there is a huge error in values of Cl and Cd I am getting. The mesh is fine, only there is a huge aspect ratio. But that is expected in such type of analysis, right? Should I increase the wall distance? I thought this much would be enough. |
|
September 8, 2014, 05:17 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
You dont have to rely on guesses when determining the correct distance of the boundary conditions. Just do a sensitivity analysis to check the influence of the distance on the variables of interest (coefficients of lift and drag in your case).
Since the values you get for cl and cd are way off, I suppose the reference values are different than those used in the analysis you are referring to. Check if you entered the correct reference values in fluent. And check if the dimensions of your mesh were imported properly (mesh -> check). Then a value of 5% for turbulence intensity seems quite high for an external flow. It should not severely affect the results for lift and drag coefficients, but I would rather take a low value like 0.1% or even smaller unless you know that the free stream is highly turbulent. Same thing for the turbulent viscosity ratio. |
|
September 10, 2014, 01:18 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Abhinav Pandey
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11 |
Checked everything and found out that the problem was with the reference values, as you have mentioned. I know it's really silly.
Thank you for your reply. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] ICEM mesh around airfoil for flow analysis in 3D | ttu004 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 8, 2013 05:34 |
Problem in conducting CFD of analysis of wind turbine blade | atulpat | CFX | 16 | August 17, 2013 04:09 |
Problem with restart solution in shape_optimization.py | robyTKD | SU2 Shape Design | 21 | May 29, 2013 09:26 |
Boundary Conditions for a standard Airfoil Optimisation Analysis | davemanson | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 15, 2013 17:28 |
Problem with nozzle analysis | Aristine | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 15, 2012 07:28 |