CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

External flow and problem with Pressure Coefficient

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 18, 2015, 16:46
Default External flow and problem with Pressure Coefficient
  #1
New Member
 
Paulina
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
p_kmb is on a distinguished road
I'm trying to simulate 2D flow over a rectangular obstacle.
It's an incompressible air flow with Re=10e6.

The problem is that I get the lowest Cp value equal to 1.15. I know that sometimes Cp can exceed 1 but I think 15% is too much.

Parameters of simulations:
- pressure based solver,
- k-e standard model (also tried RNG and realizable),
- enhanced wall treatment (y+ is lower than 5),
- velocity inlet, pressure outlet, symmetry for lateral walls of domain, and no-slip walls for obstacle,
- reference value of velocity is equal to inlet velocity.

Did anyone try to simulate flow over a bluffbody with similar Re? And got Cp=1?

I'll appreciate any help.

Paulina
p_kmb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2015, 05:04
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Paulina
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
p_kmb is on a distinguished road
What can be wrong in my simulation?
p_kmb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2015, 07:06
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Paulina
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
p_kmb is on a distinguished road
Maybe it will be more clear if I show an example.

I'm trying to recreate in Fluent a simulation from this article.
I chose the case with R=0.4 (R=B/H, B-wall along the direction of flow).

My parameters:
H=3,126 m
B=1.25 m

velocity inlet and pressure outlet:
v=0.1 m/s
k=6e-6 m2/s2
omega=0.02 1/s

upper and lower edges of the domain:
symmetry

walls of the building:
no slip conditions, roughness height=0 m

The calculation scheme is PISO, second order, and the time step=0.188 s.

The Cd mean value I got is around 3,8 and the reference article is 3.4.
Also my Cp value is 1,2.

I attached the pictures of grid, reference value and Cp.
Clearly I don't understand something and do it wrong. I can post more details if someone would like to help.
p_kmb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2015, 21:34
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Mahdi
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4
metmet is on a distinguished road
Hi Paulina
Have you done any validation process? What's the validation results?
metmet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2015, 04:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Paulina
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
p_kmb is on a distinguished road
Hi Metmet.

What do you mean by the "validation process"?
I compared my results of Cd and Cp with the results from the article.
They got mean Cd=3,4 and max value on the front edge Cp=1, whereas I have 3,7 and 1,2 respectively.
p_kmb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2015, 19:24
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Mahdi
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4
metmet is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_kmb View Post
Hi Metmet.

What do you mean by the "validation process"?
I compared my results of Cd and Cp with the results from the article.
They got mean Cd=3,4 and max value on the front edge Cp=1, whereas I have 3,7 and 1,2 respectively.
Yeap.
That's kind of validation. You need to compare your achieved results with the reference which you have done.
In your case was the grid independence study (GIS) done?
(GIS is necessary to find out your obtained results are not dependent to the grids number)
In the reference article which you have linked I found that authors have mentioned the Reynolds number equals to 21,400 (6th line of abstract) while you have performed your simulation at the Re=10e6. (1st comment)
Ans also authors have used K-Omega SST as a turbulence model while you have used K-Epsilon model.
I don't remember if your turbulence model has good agreement in viscous sub layer (due to Y+<5), to check this I suggest an article entitled "Wall y+ Strategy for Dealing with Wall-bounded Turbulent Flows BY Salim .M. Salim"
metmet is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2d flow, high reynolds number, pressure coefficient, rectangular

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 August 27, 2015 05:26
Appropriate pressure boundary condition in incompressible flow lonelywing OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 October 22, 2014 22:06
pressure gradient of a 2D periodic flow problem Honey FLUENT 0 September 19, 2012 03:21
Maintaining Static Pressure at Fluid Flow Inlet cdevalve FLUENT 3 January 14, 2012 01:11
Non-steady flow simplified for use in Vissim steamerandy Main CFD Forum 0 October 31, 2011 22:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51.