CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Problem in validation on turbine

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 27, 2015, 16:12
Default Problem in validation on turbine
  #1
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Hi dear friends,

I have simulated a turbine.

This turbine have 8 blades((360/8)=45 deg=angle between blades). Due to the circumferential symmetry, only one eight of the annulus has been computed, imposing periodic boundary conditions in the tangential direction. In my model, the computational domain has been restricted in the axial direction to four chord lengths upstream and eight chord lengths downstream of the blade.

The turbine is as follow:








A complete image of turbine as follow:





The turbine performance is expressed in terms of three non-dimensional coefficients as follow:




The problem is with the value of three above parameter. My solution converges well.
I tried different mesh topologies and all give me almost the same numbers and I used different turbulence model But the value of efficiency is very high compared to experiments. It is greater than 1 while it should be less than 1. Value of total pressure drop is validated with experiments and also value of torque corfficient is near to experiments.

Is there any adjustment that must be made in fluent before starting the calculations? can someone please give us detailed instructions about calculations of these three parameter?

Thanks,

Best,

Aja
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2015, 09:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Dear friends ,

I think that the problem is with volume flow rate(m^3/s).

Because the torque coefficient is a bit lower than to experiment and pressure drop coefficient is validated with experiment. therefore, delta p0 is ok.

I can conclude that torque should increase and also volume flow rate should increase until efficiency and torque coefficient are validated.

Now, here I have the question about boundary conditions:

Is there any adjustment that must be made in periodic condition before starting the calculations? periodic c


I selected specify pressure gradient. Is it correct?

I am grateful that guide me about this cases.

Thanks,

Best,

Aja

Last edited by aja1345; September 8, 2015 at 02:39.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2015, 11:41
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Can no-one guide?
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem in validation on naca 0012 mahdi_sangbori FLUENT 9 August 27, 2015 16:40
problem with using fan BC to simulate turbine. hujianxiao62 FLUENT 0 June 1, 2015 23:15
Waterwheel shaped turbine inside a pipe simulation problem mshahed91 CFX 3 January 10, 2015 11:19
Radial Turbine Analysis B.C Problem yjs1027 FLUENT 0 April 18, 2013 03:06
Validation of wind turbine simulations using experimental data of much lower Re Dorit Main CFD Forum 0 March 31, 2010 05:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:31.