# Continuity Residual high but total mass convergence achieved?

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 8, 2016, 07:21 Continuity Residual high but total mass convergence achieved? #1 New Member   Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi everyone, I'm working on designing an aerodynamics package for a Formula Student team and am relatively new to CFD. One thing that has been bothering me is a high continuity residual I am getting for my simulations. My x,y,z-velocity residuals are all around 1e-5, and my k and omega residuals steady around 1e-3. However, my scaled continuity residuals stays around 1e-2. Despite this, my mass flow rate between my inlet and outlet only differs by 0.0005% (all other BCs are moving walls). I know that residuals are ideally meant to drop 3 orders of magnitude at least for convergence but Fluent's scale factor for the cont. equation depends on the first 5 iterations. Would this high continuity residual be justified given the total mass of the wind tunnel has converged? My BCs are: Inlet (15m/s) Pressure Outlet Symmetry Plane Roof (moving wall -> 15m/s) Wall (moving wall -> 15m/s) Ground (moving wall -> 15m/s)

 February 8, 2016, 11:24 Under-Relaxation factor #2 New Member   InduSekhar Roy Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 You can try decreasing the Under-Relaxation factor. Setup-> Solution Controls -> Try decreasing the "Under-Relaxation factor" for "momentum" from 0.7 to 0.6. You can try decreasing till 0.1, even 0.01. But, it is advised not decrease it below 0.1 to get accurate result. Convergence Convergence I hope this helps.

 Tags continuity, mass, residual, residuals

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post skuznet OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 February 19, 2014 05:30 sivakumar OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 17, 2013 07:37 Heroic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 December 17, 2012 04:34 carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 11:16 liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top