CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

turubelnce model in ansys fluent

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 15, 2016, 08:32
Default turubelnce model in ansys fluent
  #1
Member
 
sa har
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 11
sa har is on a distinguished road
I try to simulate natural convection in channel that has rectangular fins in ansys fluent.i use boussinesq model but i dont know which turbulence model is appropriate for it.
1.k epsilon model with wall function (y+>30)
2.k epsilon model with enhanced wall treatment(y+=1)
3.standard k omega (y+=1)
4.sst k omega(y+=1)

which model is good for channel with fins?and how can i reach to intended y+?

when i calculate y+,i should choose one of the turbulence model or choose one it and try to make a fine mesh. which of this way right?
sa har is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2016, 00:23
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Make sure you are supercritical, it's fairly difficult to achieve turbulent flow in a natural convection problem. You generally need more than 1m of length to reach the critical Reynolds number.

The k-epsilon with enhanced wall treatment and kw-sst are fairly reasonable general purpose models.

You need a sufficiently fine mesh to achieve a desired y+. You do not know y+ ahead of time and you should try the calculation a few times to see what y+ you get from your solution, and then update your mesh finer/coarser as necessary.

The actual value of y+ will depend on the solution and also the turbulence model used (you'll get different y+ using different turbulence models).
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2016, 02:16
Default
  #3
Member
 
sa har
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 11
sa har is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Make sure you are supercritical, it's fairly difficult to achieve turbulent flow in a natural convection problem. You generally need more than 1m of length to reach the critical Reynolds number.

The k-epsilon with enhanced wall treatment and kw-sst are fairly reasonable general purpose models.

You need a sufficiently fine mesh to achieve a desired y+. You do not know y+ ahead of time and you should try the calculation a few times to see what y+ you get from your solution, and then update your mesh finer/coarser as necessary.

The actual value of y+ will depend on the solution and also the turbulence model used (you'll get different y+ using different turbulence models).
thanks alot foryour answer.
you are right,my channel length is more than 1 m and rayleigh number more than 1*10^9 then flow is turbulent.(i solve problem with steady state assumption)
if i use sst k-omega,should be y+ less than 1? a friends said to me that i cant use enhanced wall treatment (k-epsilon) when channel has fins is it right?
sa har is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2016, 09:19
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa har View Post
if i use sst k-omega,should be y+ less than 1?
SST needs a fine mesh. Otherwise it is equivalent to running a high Reynolds standard k-epsilon model.

The y+ does not have to be 1, what's more important is getting a sufficient number of points to resolve the boundary layer with at least 1 or 2 points in the linear regime. You can have y+ 2 or 3 or 4 and still get great results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa har View Post
a friends said to me that i cant use enhanced wall treatment (k-epsilon) when channel has fins is it right?
"can't" is a strong and one of the most biased words to use in modelling. You "can" use it, just click the stupid button in Fluent. Maybe your friend can justify why other models are not appropriate. You may ask someone and they will tell you that you cannot model real substances as a fluid with locally uniform properties. Then what do you do? Give up?
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to open Icem mesh in Ansys Fluent? emmkell FLUENT 27 February 6, 2018 03:34
Ansys Fluent Turbulence Model wall function sr71bb ANSYS 0 August 13, 2015 15:57
gambit in Ansys FLuent 13 saharesobh FLUENT 0 August 1, 2012 15:30
how can export model from fluent to ansys abcd19 ANSYS 0 June 18, 2011 15:15
ansys fluent les model bene Main CFD Forum 0 June 7, 2011 10:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:47.