|
[Sponsors] |
December 13, 1999, 02:21 |
extent of user control?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am an avid user of CFX and would like to cross over to Fluent, as it is much more user friendly on the interface end. There are certain things I need as far as control of the model is concerned, however: I need to be able to vary the boundary conditions periodically in time, and the same with the grid geometry. I also need to be able to post process by looking at each timestep to watch the unsteady flow develop in time. I have been doing these in CFX via user Fortran subroutines- are there means for accomplishing these in Fluent?
|
|
December 13, 1999, 04:28 |
Re: extent of user control?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fluent does not support moving meshes yet, so modifying the grid during a simulation is probably going to be difficult to do correctly. This is coming in version 6 though, but 6.0 isn't due out until late 2000 I think. Time-varying boundary conditions are easily done with a UDF in the current 5.2 version. UDF's are a bit tricky to write though - the doucumentation is far from complete, but the time-varying boundary condition is one of the few UDF examples that Fluent has available. Post-processing is also no problem - you can easily generate movies etc. that will show you the time-evolution.
|
|
December 13, 1999, 16:21 |
Re: extent of user control?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can either use user-defined functions (UDF) or rely upon standard interface. to specify time-varying boundary conditions. UDFs allow you to specify =transient BCs using any arbitrary functions. Alternatively, you can write a BC "profile" file in advance containing boundary values vs. time (Please see the FLUENT 5 user's guide addendum on our user-service center)and can read it into solver via standard user-interface. If BCs are periodic, you can make them repeat themselves.
Regarding the mesh, FLUENT 4.5 curently as same capability as in CFX. |
|
December 20, 1999, 08:34 |
Re: extent of user control?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You write it is possible to have a function as inlet, is it also possible to have the values at discrete points or at cell centres?
You wrote: Regarding the mesh, FLUENT 4.5 curently as same capability as in CFX Does that mean it is possible to have a grid that vary in time, in fluent? Regards Jan |
|
December 20, 1999, 11:28 |
Re: extent of user control?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is not very clear as to what you mean by saying that Fluent 4.5 has the same capability as CFX. In terms of the grid, I thought that CFX uses multi-block approach and Fluent 4.5 (structured) used single-block.
|
|
December 20, 1999, 11:58 |
Re: extent of user control?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Admittedly I wasn't clear. What I meant was: In terms of the usage and functionality of "moving/deforming" mesh, FLUENT 4.5 would be similar to what CFX offers. The original question was regarding moving/deforming mesh capability and that's probably why I did not put the modifier"moving/deforming".
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems of running Oscillating plate tutorial | vovogoal | CFX | 20 | February 4, 2016 08:03 |
error in two way fsi | kmgraju | CFX | 1 | May 2, 2011 03:32 |
user routine, user funcion, or fortran compile effect on the memroy? | princeps11 | CFX | 1 | May 13, 2009 19:37 |
maintaining a logarithmic velocity distribution | Morten Andersen | CFX | 1 | January 8, 2007 12:37 |
CFX 5.5 | Roued | CFX | 1 | October 2, 2001 17:49 |