CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

ICEPAK

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 28, 2000, 14:56
Default ICEPAK
  #1
Jayprakash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was interested in knowing if anybody used the ICEPAK for chip level and board level thermal simulations in electronic packaging applications. I need some feedback about the software. Thanks very much.

Jayprakash
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2011, 07:48
Default
  #2
Member
 
Pramodh.J
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 14
Jupudi.pramodh is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Jupudi.pramodh
Hi JayaPrakash,
I have been using Icepak for simulating the electronic circuit boards. I have found it a very simple, user friendly and and efficient package for thermal simulation of electronic components.

It is very effective for component level, board level as well as system level simulation, provided the boundary conditions and the mesh quality are appropreate.


Best regards,
Pramodh Jupudi
Jupudi.pramodh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anys IcePak mnd40335 CFX 7 March 18, 2021 03:55
Modeling the flow domain in Icepak saisanthoshm88 ANSYS 1 December 12, 2011 01:20
Modeling the flow domain in Icepak saisanthoshm88 Main CFD Forum 0 April 11, 2011 09:31
ICEPAK TUTORIAL PLEASE Benzamia FLUENT 1 August 4, 2006 08:57
Flotherm-Icepak comparison for electronic cooling Masoud Ameli FLUENT 0 February 28, 2005 10:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38.