CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Catia geometry

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 17, 2000, 11:00
Default Catia geometry
  #1
Althea
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

Can anyone out there make any recommendations on the creation or modification of Catia models for import into Gambit.

We currently are plagued with errors and problems and don't know how to overcome them. At the moment I have to virtually recreate the geometry everytime. I don't know what to suggest to our design engineers to reduce the problems.

We use IGES as the intermediate format.

Best regards Althea
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2000, 12:20
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #2
joern Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
use the vda instead of iges

icem-cfd is able to deal with this kind of horrible surfaces. i dont think that gambit is the right choice there.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2000, 07:00
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #3
Althea
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Joern,

But what is the vda and how do I import it into Gambit (which is currently my only option)?

Regards

Althea
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2000, 07:35
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #4
Joern Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VDA is a format which is similar to IGES. The VDA converter within CATIA should produce better results than the IGES converter but it requires an additional license.

Even the VDA data from CATIA consists of not connected patches with gaps and holes.

I dont see a way to use these data within Gam(e)bit. But there are a lot of companies around with the special knowlege how to deal with this problem (generating grids from Catia data with suitable tools). But this is not for free.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2000, 14:34
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #5
Anders Tenstam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, What dimension convention did you use in Catia? meter or millimeter?

I had the same problem myself, and at that time the problem was propably based on the tolerance definitions used by Catia and Gambit, respectively. I had created the Catia model in mm, and upon iges conversion in Gambit with the conversion factor 1, nothing seemed to be correct (intersection points did not coincide etc.). I tried to import the iges file using 0.001 as conversion factor (to get meters), but that was no good either. Using 0.0001 or less, though, helped me that time. Perhaps scaling the whole thing in Catia first with a factor of 0.001 (so you get dimensions in m)and then importing it with a factor of 1 is an even better idea.

Regards Anders
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2000, 09:39
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #6
Joern Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Did you use solid or surface medelling in Catia?
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2000, 10:12
Default Re: Catia geometry
  #7
Anders Tenstam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Surfaces/faces. I believe that Catia's Iges translator doesn't support solids.

/Anders
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX fatb0y CFX 3 January 14, 2012 20:42
Problem meshing an imported geometry Alicia Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 0 March 30, 2010 04:53
import catia geometry in icem v10 anorky Main CFD Forum 4 December 26, 2009 02:15
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 08:17
vitual _ real deneb FLUENT 3 January 22, 2007 05:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:26.