|
[Sponsors] |
February 17, 2000, 10:00 |
Catia geometry
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Can anyone out there make any recommendations on the creation or modification of Catia models for import into Gambit. We currently are plagued with errors and problems and don't know how to overcome them. At the moment I have to virtually recreate the geometry everytime. I don't know what to suggest to our design engineers to reduce the problems. We use IGES as the intermediate format. Best regards Althea |
|
February 17, 2000, 11:20 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
use the vda instead of iges
icem-cfd is able to deal with this kind of horrible surfaces. i dont think that gambit is the right choice there. |
|
February 18, 2000, 06:00 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Joern,
But what is the vda and how do I import it into Gambit (which is currently my only option)? Regards Althea |
|
February 18, 2000, 06:35 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
VDA is a format which is similar to IGES. The VDA converter within CATIA should produce better results than the IGES converter but it requires an additional license.
Even the VDA data from CATIA consists of not connected patches with gaps and holes. I dont see a way to use these data within Gam(e)bit. But there are a lot of companies around with the special knowlege how to deal with this problem (generating grids from Catia data with suitable tools). But this is not for free. |
|
February 24, 2000, 13:34 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, What dimension convention did you use in Catia? meter or millimeter?
I had the same problem myself, and at that time the problem was propably based on the tolerance definitions used by Catia and Gambit, respectively. I had created the Catia model in mm, and upon iges conversion in Gambit with the conversion factor 1, nothing seemed to be correct (intersection points did not coincide etc.). I tried to import the iges file using 0.001 as conversion factor (to get meters), but that was no good either. Using 0.0001 or less, though, helped me that time. Perhaps scaling the whole thing in Catia first with a factor of 0.001 (so you get dimensions in m)and then importing it with a factor of 1 is an even better idea. Regards Anders |
|
February 25, 2000, 08:39 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Did you use solid or surface medelling in Catia?
|
|
February 25, 2000, 09:12 |
Re: Catia geometry
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Surfaces/faces. I believe that Catia's Iges translator doesn't support solids.
/Anders |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX | fatb0y | CFX | 3 | January 14, 2012 19:42 |
[Gmsh] Problem meshing an imported geometry | Alicia | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 30, 2010 04:53 |
import catia geometry in icem v10 | anorky | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 26, 2009 01:15 |
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry | EmersonKB | CFX | 5 | July 2, 2009 08:17 |
vitual _ real | deneb | FLUENT | 3 | January 22, 2007 04:31 |