CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Linking/Merging Meshes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 25, 2000, 12:57
Default Linking/Merging Meshes
  #1
Brant Aggus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am doing a 3d model of a cylindrical plug flow reactor. There is a narrow annulus reactant inlet section followed by a large diameter preheating section, then a spool with small inlets for the other reactant, then a large diameter reaction zone.

The width of the annulus is narrow enough to require a high node density to mesh the volume (I am using tet/hybrid), While the preheat zone is large enough to make the same node density impractical. If I use two different node spacings, and set an 'outflow' boundary condition after the first mesh, I get an 'underflow error' when I iterate. If i try to merge or link the meshes, GAMBIT says it cannot perform this task. Does anyone know how to unite volume meshes with different node spacings? I would greatly appreciate any help as I am having this problem with several models.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2000, 13:34
Default Re: Linking/Merging Meshes
  #2
LW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I believe that the interface of two different mesh zones has to have same mesh in order to merge them. You may want to decompose the preheat zone (large volume), so you can have a transition domain from large volume to samll volume. I am not sure your "underflow error". Are you trying to define "outflow" BC in between the domains?
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2000, 04:10
Default Re: Linking/Merging Meshes
  #3
Yingjiu You
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you do not need to define the boundary conditions between the domains. Could you explain your problem more detailed?
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2000, 06:54
Default Re: Linking/Merging Meshes
  #4
Volker Pawlik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Did you try to use the non-conformal interface boundary?
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2000, 14:02
Default Re: Linking/Merging Meshes
  #5
Shyam Kishor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Seems you have topologically disconnected volumes in the model with multiple faces at the interface. This is ok only if you want to use a nonconformal mesh. In that case, you should define an interface boundary as suggested by Volker.

For conformal mesh, you should do a "face connect" to connect coincident faces at the interface. Then remesh the volumes. You do not need to define the boundary condition at the interface, which should be of interior type.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2000, 15:34
Default Re: Linking/Merging Meshes
  #6
Brant Aggus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, everybody, for your suggestions. I used a nonconformal grid and that seems to be the fix. I am currently working on the reactor I described and a couple of other aerosol reactor geometries for my M.S. project, and I am going to put them on my website if it would be interesting to anybody. I'll post the URL here when I am done.

Thanks,

Brant
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automatic Mesh Refinement and Tetrahedral Meshes philippose OpenFOAM Meshing Format & General Technical 6 May 6, 2014 11:28
Getting prism to inflate into mixed tet-hex meshes Joe CFX 16 October 10, 2011 07:06
HELP!! How could I obtain structured-orthogonal-body fitted meshes???? DajeMoo ANSYS 0 January 28, 2011 13:52
Dynamic Meshes Cfdtoy FLUENT 2 February 6, 2004 13:14
Large 3D tetrahedral meshes Aldo Bonfiglioli Main CFD Forum 4 August 27, 1999 03:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57.