|
[Sponsors] |
Non-overlapping portion in non-conformal meshing |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 22, 2000, 02:39 |
Non-overlapping portion in non-conformal meshing
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
In my 3D simulation, Fluent is not allowing the flow across the non-overlapping portion of the interface that used for non-conformal meshing. What can I do overcome this situation? Thanking you, Remesh. |
|
July 23, 2000, 03:34 |
Re: Non-overlapping portion in non-conformal meshi
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It has changed the non overlapping portions to wall zones. That is why there is no fluid flow across that portion. When you create a new mesh you can spilt the wall zones at the point where the non-overlapping portion begins
|
|
July 24, 2000, 23:20 |
Re: Non-overlapping portion in non-conformal meshi
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Michael,
Is it true that the non-overlapped portion of the mesh has been transformed to wall? In that case, can i change the automatically generated wall to some other zone type so that the flow will not be affected? Thanks, Ramesh. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Commercial meshers] non conformal interface, meshing, inverted volume | araghunath | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | April 7, 2011 04:27 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 05:01 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 11:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 11:08 |
Is conformal meshing really an advantage? | Alvin Szeto | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2003 07:23 |