CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

FIDAP-simulation with high viscotities

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 4, 2000, 11:16
Default FIDAP-simulation with high viscotities
  #1
Wolfgang Korte
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I use FIDAP to simulate a flow of molten plastic through a nozzle. Typically the viscosities of the plastic is very high (approx. 1000 to 10000 Pa s) and the velocities are very low (approx. 0.010 m/s), high pressure losses have to be expected (approx. 100 bar to 500 bar). I have severe problems to get convergence of the solution and if convergence is achieved the solution does not appear physically meaningful. I used the segredated solver as well as a coupled solver. For both solvers the solution diverged after more or less iterations. I have already tried several methods of stabilization and convergence acceleration etc. (e.g. INCREMENTAL, RELAXATION, UPWINDING). Also I have increased the viscosity incrementally via RESTART-Runs to get an initial solution for the subsequent iterations. Nothing of all helped so solve the problem. Does anybody has an idea.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 2000, 08:28
Default Re: FIDAP-simulation with high viscotities
  #2
A. Hassaneen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm not sure if you should set up a nonNewtonian fluid in the PROPLEM difinition. Also, try to run the code for one iteration and see what's going on. As I always suggest on FIDAP: try to run the first 5 iterations using (S.S.) solver and then switch to N.R. solver. Good luck
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2000, 14:14
Default Re: FIDAP-simulation with high viscotities
  #3
Elliot Schwartz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
With very low Reynolds number flows due to fluids with very high viscosity like molten plastics, I have had success by non-dimensionalizing the problem. Chapter 10 of the FIDAP 8 Tutorial Manual explains how to non-dimensionalize your problem and how this affects the parameters in your simulation. For your case the low Reynolds number formulation would be appropriate.

Let me know if you would like more information.

Viele Gruesse,

Elliot
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Resume Transient simulation HMR CFX 1 June 28, 2011 21:13
High aspect ratio cells with checkmesh gian_ing OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 December 2, 2008 10:45
Continuous vs interrupted simulation sega OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 November 3, 2008 15:29
Overflow problem in steady simulation ReeKo CFX 11 October 8, 2008 17:57
Electroosmosis simulation by fidap YKuo Main CFD Forum 0 December 16, 2002 05:58


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56.