CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

NOISE & CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 6, 2000, 14:12
Default NOISE & CFD
  #1
l
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How can we use CFD to help in making acoustic design change for automotive exhaust system?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2000, 21:57
Default Re: NOISE & CFD
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). There are two areas: (a). the engine exhaust pipe system for 4-stroke engine,to reduce the exhaust pressure by fine tuning of the waves in pipe system, (b). the muffler system to even out the pressure waves. (2). I think, both have been studied by 1-D wave equations. You could make it more complicated by studying 2-D or 3-D unsteady, compressible flow solutions. (3). I am not sure that 2-D, or 3-D will make the study of the flow behavior more accurate or realistic. The primary feature is the wave propagation and the wave interaction.(the pressure waves)
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2000, 09:49
Default Re: NOISE & CFD
  #3
l
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do the normal CFD codes like FLUENT have the wave equation in them?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2000, 19:14
Default Re: NOISE & CFD
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). It has a 3-D transient compressible Navier-Stokes code,which I think, is required to do the pressure wave simulation.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2000, 04:28
Default Re: NOISE & CFD
  #5
Kenji Takeda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Use of CFD codes for acoustic wave propagation can be carried out succesfully. However, a very fine grid and timestep are required. Typically, with a second order code like Fluent you require at least 50 gridpoints per acoustic wavelength. This is due to the excessive dispersion and dissipation characteristics of the scheme used. Upwind differencing schemes are inherently dissipative, so very efficient at damping out acoustic waves. Not good if that's what you're trying to capture.

Also, in order to obtain a reasonable spectrum you will need to run the unsteady simulation for long enough to be able to capture several periods of the oscillation.

A MAJOR problem is that of non-reflecting boundary conditions. For an internal flow this isn't really a problem, but if any of the grid extends to freespace you will require a special non-reflecting condition. Otherwise acoustic waves will reflect from the boundary. You will not see these waves when plotting pressure contours, as acoustic waves are up to 5 orders of magnitude less than hydrodynamic pressuures. To try and get around this without specifically writing a new boundary condition, you can just put a stretched block at the outer boundary that goes to a very coarse resolution at the far edge. This will then use artificial viscosity to damp out any outgoing waves. The symptoms for this not working are that the simulation works for a transient period but then blows up.

You will only see the acoustic waves if you plot around +/-100 Pa of the mean pressure, so you'll have to reset the contour levels for pressure when visualising the results.

Good luck, hope this is of use. Cheers, Dr Kenji Takeda University of Southampton www.soton.ac.uk/~ktakeda
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2000, 04:15
Default Re: NOISE & CFD
  #6
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). If one starts the modeling from the exhaust valve side of the engine, the pressure wave is likely to be somewhat stronger than the "acoustic" waves as the exhaust gas leaves the exhaust valve into the exhaust pipe. (2). If one removes the muffler from the exhaust pipe, that pressure wave will create very loud noise, much higher than the "acoustic" waves. (3). Well, you are right to point out that numerical scheme used can affect the accuracy of the transient solution. The low Mach number can also pose another problem for transient compressible flow formulation.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noise prediction by CFD Alan H. Glenn FLUENT 1 March 12, 2002 01:03
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2000 10:07
PC vs. Workstation Tim Franke Main CFD Forum 5 September 29, 1999 15:01
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25.