|December 18, 2000, 06:18||
Dirichlet B.C. for k-epsilon
For a scientific comparison, i try to simulate a grid tank with fluent. There is no mean flow in this experiment. Turbulence is produced by an oscillating grid at the bottom of the domain of interest. Turbulence performs diffusion and dissipation of itself in the fluid.
Experiments and analytical solutions are available for the case.
I want to give a Dirichlet (fixed value) boundary condition for k and epsilon on the bottom of the tank. (side walls - symmetry; top - pressure outlet) Is it a mistake to specify a " velocity inflow" boundary, is it impossible to specify such kind of boundary with Flunet 5.4 , or is there a bug in Fluent's standart k-epsilon discretisation?
Thanks for help in advance Jens
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded||nedved||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||13||November 4, 2013 15:13|
|Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence||jonmec||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||July 28, 2011 05:24|
|How to get reference to k and epsilon in the epsEqn and kEqn||cfd_explorer||OpenFOAM Programming & Development||0||March 10, 2011 11:16|
|SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded||nedved||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||1||November 25, 2008 21:21|
|Inlet B.C for epsilon in k-e model||Abhijit Tilak||Main CFD Forum||0||March 14, 2002 18:37|