|January 29, 2001, 07:05||
As some of you will know, I have been experiencing some difficulties with Gambit. I haven't given up on it (yet) but because some of the problems have impacted major projects I have worked on, I am looking around for potential alternatives. I will need to assess several alternatives to be able to justify any change.
Is there anyone out there who can make any recommendations? I use Fluent 5 and the more complex geometries require hybrid meshes (structured in some regions, unstructured in others). Complex geometries come from Catia (which causes a lot of problems in Gambit). They are not simple shapes and have often been created using Catia surfacing. I also need to be able to include boundary layer cells.
Software with a UK contact is essential.
All suggestions, comments and recommendations will be gratefully accepted.
Best wishes to you all. Althea
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Recommend software for simple post processing||zonexo||Main CFD Forum||5||March 4, 2006 04:20|
|Test post processing software||Eugene||Phoenics||14||May 22, 2003 08:30|
|Post Processing Software||Eugene||Phoenics||4||September 6, 2002 03:24|
|PRE and POST processing package||Astrid Barros||Main CFD Forum||6||November 16, 2000 11:31|
|Looking for Pre and Post software||Patrick van der Velde||Main CFD Forum||0||May 13, 2000 07:40|