# limited turbulent viscosity ratio

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 2, 2001, 04:53 limited turbulent viscosity ratio #1 Volker Pawlik Guest   Posts: n/a Hello cfd-community, actually I am working on a problem with a - for me - very high Re-numer (about 1E6). Since I am accustomed to lower numbers I am a little uncertain about how to handle some of the problems which appeared: 1.) During the solving process the turblulent vicosity ratio was limited just inside the area of interest. When I estimate the turbulent intensity I by I=0.16*Re^(-0.125) it gave similar values to what Fluent reported. So my question is whether it is reasonable to increase the default limit due to the high Re to avoid hitting the limit or whether s.th else could be wrong (may be it is related with 2. 2.) To achieve 30 < y+ < 60 I would need too much cells. Sung-Eun Kim from Fluent mentioned in the past that it is ok for high Re flows to increase the upper limit. I followed the advice and generated cells to achieve y+ about 500. The question is: Is s.o. able to assess, whether 500 is still ok for such a Re? (the domain is similar to a t-pipe) Volker

 April 2, 2001, 12:50 Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio #2 Scott W Guest   Posts: n/a 1) I've seen Fluent have difficulty with the turbulent viscosity ratio. If you expect the result to be near the limit, then by all means raise the limit. If you expect the result to be much smaller than the limit, then you need to try to solve it in a different manner. Some possibilities: (A) temporarily change the boundary conditions (less turbulent) and get a solution, then use that as your initial conditions for the real boundary conditions. (B) Take time and give good initial conditions (use the patch tool to patch your turbulent parameters - more turbulent near disturbances...). (C) Solve the flow with laminar fluid, change viscosity to turbulent, turn off momentum equations and then solve just the turbulent equations, turn on momentum equations and solve from there. 2) Try to model a small section of your domain. Do it with an initial y+ of 50 and again with an initial y+ of 500. Do the results change? If so you cannot use the larger grid.

 April 2, 2001, 13:50 Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio #3 John Wait Guest   Posts: n/a (1) I've had problems with high and limited TVR as well. I'd like to know more on this subject as well. I've spent a lot of time trying to avoid this limit with limited success and almost no difference in final results. (2) I've had good correlation to test data with max Y+ of 150 to 200. I think 500 is too high. You can try region adapting in just the area of interest to get Y+ levels down and not increase the model size unnecessarily. In the worst cases you'll need to generate a prism boundary layer mesh. John

 April 3, 2001, 10:20 Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio #4 Volker Pawlik Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Scott, thank you for your answer. Due to the high estimated turbulent intensity I mentioned I should expect high turbulent viscosity ratios. Hence: Meanwhile I raised the limit and got rid of the warning. Next I should test 2.) of your proposals. Volker

 April 3, 2001, 10:42 Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio #5 Volker Pawlik Guest   Posts: n/a Hi John, thank you for your answer. 1.) I think 2 is a good idea which I already carried out. This helps to keep the mesh small and useable. 2.) Your statement concerning y+=500: is it just a feeling or can you deduct it from the correlation at y+=200? Volker P.S. Have a look to my answer to scott.

 April 3, 2001, 10:50 Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio #6 John Wait Guest   Posts: n/a I've actually had areas of flow separation and recirculation that did not occur in a model with Y+ of 500 that were indicated in a flow viz test. When the Y+ levels were brought down into the 100-150 range it did predict the test results. John

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ZQWY FLUENT 15 June 19, 2016 03:00 omar.2002bh FLUENT 2 September 5, 2012 11:04 eespi002 FLUENT 3 June 30, 2009 13:24 Cyril FLUENT 8 February 7, 2006 21:34 David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:32.