CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

limited turbulent viscosity ratio

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 2, 2001, 04:53
Default limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #1
Volker Pawlik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello cfd-community,

actually I am working on a problem with a - for me - very high Re-numer (about 1E6). Since I am accustomed to lower numbers I am a little uncertain about how to handle some of the problems which appeared:

1.) During the solving process the turblulent vicosity ratio was limited just inside the area of interest. When I estimate the turbulent intensity I by I=0.16*Re^(-0.125) it gave similar values to what Fluent reported. So my question is whether it is reasonable to increase the default limit due to the high Re to avoid hitting the limit or whether s.th else could be wrong (may be it is related with 2.

2.) To achieve 30 < y+ < 60 I would need too much cells. Sung-Eun Kim from Fluent mentioned in the past that it is ok for high Re flows to increase the upper limit. I followed the advice and generated cells to achieve y+ about 500. The question is: Is s.o. able to assess, whether 500 is still ok for such a Re? (the domain is similar to a t-pipe)

Volker
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2001, 12:50
Default Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #2
Scott W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1) I've seen Fluent have difficulty with the turbulent viscosity ratio. If you expect the result to be near the limit, then by all means raise the limit. If you expect the result to be much smaller than the limit, then you need to try to solve it in a different manner. Some possibilities: (A) temporarily change the boundary conditions (less turbulent) and get a solution, then use that as your initial conditions for the real boundary conditions. (B) Take time and give good initial conditions (use the patch tool to patch your turbulent parameters - more turbulent near disturbances...). (C) Solve the flow with laminar fluid, change viscosity to turbulent, turn off momentum equations and then solve just the turbulent equations, turn on momentum equations and solve from there.

2) Try to model a small section of your domain. Do it with an initial y+ of 50 and again with an initial y+ of 500. Do the results change? If so you cannot use the larger grid.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2001, 13:50
Default Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #3
John Wait
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1) I've had problems with high and limited TVR as well. I'd like to know more on this subject as well. I've spent a lot of time trying to avoid this limit with limited success and almost no difference in final results.

(2) I've had good correlation to test data with max Y+ of 150 to 200. I think 500 is too high. You can try region adapting in just the area of interest to get Y+ levels down and not increase the model size unnecessarily. In the worst cases you'll need to generate a prism boundary layer mesh.

John
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2001, 10:20
Default Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #4
Volker Pawlik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Scott,

thank you for your answer.

Due to the high estimated turbulent intensity I mentioned I should expect high turbulent viscosity ratios. Hence:

Meanwhile I raised the limit and got rid of the warning.

Next I should test 2.) of your proposals.

Volker
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2001, 10:42
Default Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #5
Volker Pawlik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi John,

thank you for your answer.

1.) I think 2 is a good idea which I already carried out. This helps to keep the mesh small and useable.

2.) Your statement concerning y+=500: is it just a feeling or can you deduct it from the correlation at y+=200?

Volker

P.S. Have a look to my answer to scott.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2001, 10:50
Default Re: limited turbulent viscosity ratio
  #6
John Wait
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've actually had areas of flow separation and recirculation that did not occur in a model with Y+ of 500 that were indicated in a flow viz test. When the Y+ levels were brought down into the 100-150 range it did predict the test results.

John
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 in 511831 cells ZQWY FLUENT 13 June 11, 2015 19:11
hel (turbulent viscosity ratio limited) for supersonic combustion problem omar.2002bh FLUENT 2 September 5, 2012 11:04
Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.0000000e+5 eespi002 FLUENT 3 June 30, 2009 13:24
Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio... Cyril FLUENT 8 February 7, 2006 21:34
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34.