|
[Sponsors] |
April 3, 2001, 04:11 |
Fluent Vs Icepak
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Has anybody worked on Icepak and Fluent both? What are the differences between them? Which one is better for Heat transfer ( Forced, Natural and radiation ) problems? Which one would give faster results for complex geometries?
regards, Ashutosh |
|
April 3, 2001, 12:37 |
Re: Fluent Vs Icepak
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fluent is a general-purpose code. Icepak is a purpose-specific core for thermal evaluation of integrated circuits and other electronic packaging. Which one is better depends on whether or not you are evaluating electronics packaging.
|
|
April 3, 2001, 16:04 |
Re: Fluent Vs Icepak
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is absolutely no difference between the two as far as computation is concerned. The only difference is on the geometry and mesh generation, which is automatic in icepak (or airpak). The solver is exactly the same solver. Ask Fluent Inc. They will tell you.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stopping a Fluent batch job AND saving the data! Possible? | Volker Pawlik | FLUENT | 13 | December 28, 2020 04:16 |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 03:22 |
How to open Icem mesh in Ansys Fluent? | emmkell | FLUENT | 27 | February 6, 2018 03:34 |
Fluent 6.3 32bit vs Fluent 12.0 64bit | ibex7 | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2011 02:44 |
Problems in lauching FLUENT | Lourival | FLUENT | 3 | January 16, 2008 16:48 |