CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Particle tracking using fluent 5

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 29, 2001, 10:52
Default Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #1
John Beveridge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am using fluent 5 to track particles down a 0.19m diameter pipe with a velocity of 0.6 m/s. Is there a limit to the size of particles I can accurately measure (i.e. 10% of diameter)? and do they have to be positioned at a certain distance away from the pipe wall (i.e. 0.5 diameter)?

Any help in this matter would be most appreciated. Thanks, John
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2001, 11:54
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #2
rafi friend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i think one thing you must do is setting the inlet sources completely (from surface, or from file, single etc. read fluent manual). but you can guess if you specify particle inlet with diameter 0.5 mm and 0.4 mm away from pipe wall.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2001, 05:25
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #3
John Beveridge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Rafi, but I am really after the maximum size that a particle can be - obviously a particle can't be modelled well if it is 99% of the diameter of the pipeline. So what is the biggest it can be, and still be moved to a reasonable degree?
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2001, 09:08
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #4
Althea
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello John,

Assuming that Lagrangian particle tracking is used (as per Fluent 4) then the volume fraction limit usually advised (in the papers I've read - sorry I have no references to hand) is about 12%. I would therefore translate this into a single particle with a diameter of less than 12% of the pipe diameter, or if several particles are simulated, the sum of their diameters should be less than 12% of the pipe diameter.

As is always the case, it is useful to have some reliable experimental data (or even hand calcs.) of a similar type of system, with which to compare the CFD to check you are in the right ballpark.

I hope this helps.

Regards

Althea
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2001, 09:10
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #5
John Beveridge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks for that! I appreciate your help in this matter
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2001, 11:53
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #6
HGG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,Althea, If case is a converged-diverged pipe, do you mean the translated diameter should be less than 12% of diameter of samll section(throat of constricting part)?

thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2001, 05:19
Default Re: Particle tracking using fluent 5
  #7
Althea
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, that seems reasonable. Althea
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Steady state particle tracking? John CFX 5 August 11, 2013 18:34
Particle Tracking Batis CFX 2 October 6, 2010 15:20
restarting lagrange (particle tracking) simulation dbdias CFX 0 September 22, 2007 19:26
Big Biomass Particle Tracking in FLUENT Jacklyn FLUENT 8 May 14, 2007 10:28
particle tracking collection tank Neser CFX 1 June 1, 2006 10:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:51.