# negative uds value despite zero bc

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 10, 2001, 09:02 negative uds value despite zero bc #1 Elmar Riesmeier Guest   Posts: n/a Hi there, this is a serious problem with fluent 5.5. I am calculating a combustion chamber with several inlets. 3 additional scalar transport equations are defined, and for one of those scalars zero boundary conditions are defined for most of the inlets. In spite of this a negative value stream of this scalar enters the domain through one of the inlets where bc is zero, getting smaller with preceding iteration steps, up to -14, even though this scalar is per definition between 0 and 1. Can anyone help? Is a conflict with user defined variables possible? Thank you, Elmar

 June 11, 2001, 00:09 Re: negative uds value despite zero bc #2 Greg Perkins Guest   Posts: n/a Is it zero at the boundary or close to it???? If the later, it may be something else. Check diffusion co-efficients (Fluent had default of 1) and how you defined the mass flux that convects the scalar. You mention that by defition this scalar is between 0 and 1. I gather then this is a mass fraction or soemthing. But Fluent will be unaware of any constrainsts that need to be imposed physically on the user scalar solution (boundedness etc.), in which case you will almost certainly have to ensure this using udfs during the solution process. The easiest way is probably to use Patankar's (see his book) method with a source term linearization to ensure the solution remains within specified limits. Greg Perkins

 June 11, 2001, 03:05 Re: negative uds value despite zero bc #3 Elmar Riesmeier Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you, Greg! Information you requested: boundary condition at this particular error-producing inlet is zero. The scalar corresponds to a mixture fraction as included in FLUENT's Pdf model. Therefore you don't have any source term in the transport equation for this scalar - no evaporation of liquid fuel assumed. Diffusion coefficient at inlet bc is already set to 0, and convective flux is set to mass flow rate. I am still wondering why this only happens with second order discretization. Can anyone commend on that?

 June 11, 2001, 21:22 Re: negative uds value despite zero bc #4 Greg Perkins Guest   Posts: n/a Perhaps it is a bug. Have you tried asking Fluent???? Greg

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM 3 June 24, 2011 13:06 balkrishna OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 August 17, 2010 02:39 gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11 Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00 Matthew Brannock FLUENT 3 February 15, 2002 08:10

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:07.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top