CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Cd problems

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2001, 19:16
Default Cd problems
  #1
Chetan Kadakia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm running both laminar and turbulent flow past a cylinder. I monitor coefficient of drag on the cylinder surface and where my force vector is x=1, y=0. In the laminar case I get a Cd much smaller than expected and on the turbulent case I am getting a Cd much higher than expected. I am using Cd vs. Re for a cylinder published data. Am I using the force monitoring incorrectly? Please advise.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2001, 08:53
Default Re: Cd problems
  #2
Alain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do you have a mesh independant solution ?

I think that this case is one of the validatio cases of Fluent. So I should find more information on Fluent's CDs

Best regards

Alain
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2001, 12:55
Default Re: Cd problems
  #3
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). When you have problems , you can try simple problems such as "flow over a flat plate". (2). Everyone who is using a commercial should try to obtain the solution to the flow over a flat plate first. In this way, it will verify your skill and the code's capability, or the combination. (2). If you can't get accurate solution for the flow over a flat plate, then you should not be doing CFD at all. Because the only other simpler case is the uniform flow. (3). And you would find that even for the simple flow over the flat plate, to get accurate solution is also very challenging. (I could not even pass this step when checking out the Fluent code. As I changed the mesh, my flat plate solution also changed)
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2001, 13:46
Default Re: Cd problems
  #4
Chetan Kadakia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have a grid independent solution for the laminar case, that I know. I have done the flat plate with confidence many months back. Any other suggestions?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2001, 13:59
Default Re: Cd problems
  #5
Chetan Kadakia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
One more thing: when I perform the unsteady laminar solution, I get an appropriate frequency (1/time period) and my seperation point and bondary layer thicknesses (momentum and displacement) all are within close approximation to values obtain using Thwaites approximation. It leads me to believe I have a correct solution for the most part. And I would think drag being viscous and not induced (the steady lift value is and should be zero) would be a primary function of accuracy within the boundary layer. My grid is also grid independent with respect to the boundary layer (as well as for fresstream conditions). Could it have to do with my use of velocity inlet and outlow conditions? My choice of constant density (fluid is a water), a use of 1st order momentum discretization (using 2nd order here would not allow for convergence)? Am I supposed to supply a reference value for reporting (I did not do that)? Let me know if you think of any thing.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2001, 18:45
Default Re: Cd problems
  #6
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). If you are dealing with laminar flows, then the only source of inaccuracy will be the algorithm used in the code. (2). You can select higher-order algorithms available in the code, and see whether you are getting better results. (3). What is the mesh size and the Reynolds number of your case?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 30, 2001, 08:31
Default Re: Cd problems
  #7
Bipin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Did you change the reference values like the velocity, density, area etc. in the Fluent panel

Go to Report ----> Reference Values and change the values. You will need to change area and velocity.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 30, 2001, 12:59
Default Re: Cd problems
  #8
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). This is one of the black hole for me a few years ago. (2). I think, it is hard to fix the GUI, so that the user can input the reference values before computing the coefficients.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02
Needed Benchmark Problems for FSI Mechstud Main CFD Forum 4 July 26, 2011 12:13
Some problems with Star CD Micha CD-adapco 0 August 6, 2003 13:55
Airpak: Problems with heat flow contour conditions Ivan de Miguel Urain FLUENT 1 November 16, 2001 10:36
Inverse problems Aleksey Alekseev Main CFD Forum 0 May 12, 1999 15:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:32.