# Cd problems

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 7, 2001, 19:16 Cd problems #1 Chetan Kadakia Guest   Posts: n/a I'm running both laminar and turbulent flow past a cylinder. I monitor coefficient of drag on the cylinder surface and where my force vector is x=1, y=0. In the laminar case I get a Cd much smaller than expected and on the turbulent case I am getting a Cd much higher than expected. I am using Cd vs. Re for a cylinder published data. Am I using the force monitoring incorrectly? Please advise.

 July 8, 2001, 08:53 Re: Cd problems #2 Alain Guest   Posts: n/a Do you have a mesh independant solution ? I think that this case is one of the validatio cases of Fluent. So I should find more information on Fluent's CDs Best regards Alain

 July 8, 2001, 12:55 Re: Cd problems #3 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). When you have problems , you can try simple problems such as "flow over a flat plate". (2). Everyone who is using a commercial should try to obtain the solution to the flow over a flat plate first. In this way, it will verify your skill and the code's capability, or the combination. (2). If you can't get accurate solution for the flow over a flat plate, then you should not be doing CFD at all. Because the only other simpler case is the uniform flow. (3). And you would find that even for the simple flow over the flat plate, to get accurate solution is also very challenging. (I could not even pass this step when checking out the Fluent code. As I changed the mesh, my flat plate solution also changed)

 July 8, 2001, 13:46 Re: Cd problems #4 Chetan Kadakia Guest   Posts: n/a I have a grid independent solution for the laminar case, that I know. I have done the flat plate with confidence many months back. Any other suggestions?

 July 8, 2001, 13:59 Re: Cd problems #5 Chetan Kadakia Guest   Posts: n/a One more thing: when I perform the unsteady laminar solution, I get an appropriate frequency (1/time period) and my seperation point and bondary layer thicknesses (momentum and displacement) all are within close approximation to values obtain using Thwaites approximation. It leads me to believe I have a correct solution for the most part. And I would think drag being viscous and not induced (the steady lift value is and should be zero) would be a primary function of accuracy within the boundary layer. My grid is also grid independent with respect to the boundary layer (as well as for fresstream conditions). Could it have to do with my use of velocity inlet and outlow conditions? My choice of constant density (fluid is a water), a use of 1st order momentum discretization (using 2nd order here would not allow for convergence)? Am I supposed to supply a reference value for reporting (I did not do that)? Let me know if you think of any thing.

 July 8, 2001, 18:45 Re: Cd problems #6 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). If you are dealing with laminar flows, then the only source of inaccuracy will be the algorithm used in the code. (2). You can select higher-order algorithms available in the code, and see whether you are getting better results. (3). What is the mesh size and the Reynolds number of your case?

 July 30, 2001, 08:31 Re: Cd problems #7 Bipin Guest   Posts: n/a Did you change the reference values like the velocity, density, area etc. in the Fluent panel Go to Report ----> Reference Values and change the values. You will need to change area and velocity.

 July 30, 2001, 12:59 Re: Cd problems #8 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). This is one of the black hole for me a few years ago. (2). I think, it is hard to fix the GUI, so that the user can input the reference values before computing the coefficients.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02 Mechstud Main CFD Forum 4 July 26, 2011 12:13 Micha CD-adapco 0 August 6, 2003 13:55 Ivan de Miguel Urain FLUENT 1 November 16, 2001 10:36 Aleksey Alekseev Main CFD Forum 0 May 12, 1999 15:38

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22.