|
[Sponsors] |
September 19, 2001, 03:13 |
reaction rate expression
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all i am simulating the combustion of CO and dry air using the finite-rate-model. In FLUENT the reaction rate expression is used with water steam as follows:
k=2.239E+12exp(-1.7E+8/T)(CO)(O2)^0.25(H2O)^0.5 but í´d like to get the expression WITHOUT WATER STEAM. please give me a hand. thanks in advance. |
|
September 20, 2001, 14:00 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
use the DEFINE_VR_RATE MACRO to program your reaction rate into each cell in the domain.
|
|
September 21, 2001, 02:22 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks sivakumar,i´d like to know the reaction rate expression without water stream, not how to implemente the expression in the code.
|
|
September 21, 2001, 04:39 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is the standard global form for this equation. The dependence on steam is due to reaction of radicals such as OH if a multi-step scheme is used (See Westbrook & Dryer, Comb Sci Tech., vol 27, 1981).
If your system doesn't have steam you might try leaving off the steam dependence. I haven't seen a form like this in the literature though. Perhaps others can comment on this. Physically though CO and O2 react almost instantaneously at high temps (1500-3000K). Depending upon your setup, you might find Fluent has difficulty with these reactions using only the finite rate model. I've had to use some numerical limiting using a udf to get solutions and then test the sensitivity of these limiters with respect to the solution, for laminar diffusion flames, since Fluent can't handle the stiff kinetics. I believe other software (CFD-ACE?) can handle this better than Fluent. Have you managed to get any converged solution using the rates above. What solver and settings have you tried? Greg According to Westbrook & Dryer |
|
September 21, 2001, 05:12 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Greg Perkins, thank you for your comments. Yes, only using the finite reate model in Fluent is very difficulty to get a reasonalbe solution. I hve used the eddy-dissipation/finite-rate model with segrated solver. The converged solution i can get. The simulated Temperature, CO2 and O2 content are very good agreement with the experimental results. But the calculated CO content is 5 to 10 times higher or lower than the experiment data.
|
|
September 22, 2001, 03:21 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is your problem turbulent or laminar?
Greg |
|
September 24, 2001, 04:38 |
Re: reaction rate expression
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,the gas flow in my system is turbulent.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? | NewKid | OpenFOAM | 18 | January 20, 2011 16:55 |
How to install CGNS under windows xp? | lzgwhy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 11, 2011 18:44 |
CGNS lib and Fortran compiler | manaliac | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 29, 2010 06:25 |
UDF changing the rate exponent of a reaction | Stefan H | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | September 16, 2009 13:20 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 00:07 |