CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

reaction rate expression

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 19, 2001, 03:13
Default reaction rate expression
  #1
tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all i am simulating the combustion of CO and dry air using the finite-rate-model. In FLUENT the reaction rate expression is used with water steam as follows:

k=2.239E+12exp(-1.7E+8/T)(CO)(O2)^0.25(H2O)^0.5

but í´d like to get the expression WITHOUT WATER STEAM. please give me a hand.

thanks in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 20, 2001, 14:00
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #2
sivakumar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
use the DEFINE_VR_RATE MACRO to program your reaction rate into each cell in the domain.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2001, 02:22
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #3
tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks sivakumar,i´d like to know the reaction rate expression without water stream, not how to implemente the expression in the code.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2001, 04:39
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #4
Greg Perkins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is the standard global form for this equation. The dependence on steam is due to reaction of radicals such as OH if a multi-step scheme is used (See Westbrook & Dryer, Comb Sci Tech., vol 27, 1981).

If your system doesn't have steam you might try leaving off the steam dependence. I haven't seen a form like this in the literature though. Perhaps others can comment on this.

Physically though CO and O2 react almost instantaneously at high temps (1500-3000K). Depending upon your setup, you might find Fluent has difficulty with these reactions using only the finite rate model. I've had to use some numerical limiting using a udf to get solutions and then test the sensitivity of these limiters with respect to the solution, for laminar diffusion flames, since Fluent can't handle the stiff kinetics. I believe other software (CFD-ACE?) can handle this better than Fluent.

Have you managed to get any converged solution using the rates above. What solver and settings have you tried?

Greg

According to Westbrook & Dryer
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2001, 05:12
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #5
tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Greg Perkins, thank you for your comments. Yes, only using the finite reate model in Fluent is very difficulty to get a reasonalbe solution. I hve used the eddy-dissipation/finite-rate model with segrated solver. The converged solution i can get. The simulated Temperature, CO2 and O2 content are very good agreement with the experimental results. But the calculated CO content is 5 to 10 times higher or lower than the experiment data.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2001, 03:21
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #6
Greg Perkins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is your problem turbulent or laminar?

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2001, 04:38
Default Re: reaction rate expression
  #7
tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,the gas flow in my system is turbulent.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? NewKid OpenFOAM 18 January 20, 2011 16:55
How to install CGNS under windows xp? lzgwhy Main CFD Forum 1 January 11, 2011 18:44
CGNS lib and Fortran compiler manaliac Main CFD Forum 2 November 29, 2010 06:25
UDF changing the rate exponent of a reaction Stefan H Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 September 16, 2009 13:20
chemical reaction - decompostition La S. Hyuck CFX 1 May 23, 2001 00:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39.