CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference frame

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 25, 2001, 14:47
Default solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference frame
  #1
Min-Hua Wang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello, All:

Does anybody have experience in the simulation of the stirred tank for solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference frame.

Thanks

MHW
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2001, 05:00
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #2
Alain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I do,

what is your question ?

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2001, 12:39
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #3
Min-Hua Wang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks.

I am working on CFD simulation for a stirred tank without baffle blade. I was using Mixsim to setup multi-reference frame and to start single phase simulation. The working fluid is water. The convergency is good. Then I run two-phase simulation withing fluent 4 environement. The solid has 200 micro meter in size and the solid density is 1200 kg/m^3. Volume fraction f solid is about 15%.

I run simulation in time transient flow with Eulerian (Granular) model. Also I selected Gidaspow model for granular viscosity. Schuh model is selected for Drag force. The rest I left tehm by default data.

How do I justify the final solution. I always observed that the mass residual is very hard to be reduced. The suspension of solid seems to me not developed. How long should I run the simulation.

Can you suggest me some experience? Many thanks. MHW
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2001, 14:59
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #4
Alain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi MHW

I did a simulation very similar to yours a couple years ago. Multiphase model can be very difficult to handle, depending on your flow condition.

First of all, if you don't have any baffle you can run your problem as a single rotating frame. This may help your convergence.

You should underelax your interphase momentum exchange term even if you run a transient simulation. it may help to suppress this momentum exchange at the begining of the calculation.

In some case you'll need to deactivate multigrid for pressure. Convergence is longer but the space marching solver is more stable than the MG solver for multiphase calculation.

At last, I will suggest you to lower your time step. if your calculation is too long and you are looking for the steady state solution you can also make fewer iteration in each time step.

I hope this could help you.

Alain
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2001, 12:54
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #5
Lanre
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
MRF is a steady-state model ONLY, hence, is incompatible with the Eulerian-Granular multiphase model in FLUENT 4.

Since you have no baffles, delete the MRF zone and convert to a single frame of reference (See FLUENT 4.4 Users' Guide). Now you can solve the transient mixing and include the Eulerian-Granular model for your multiphase calculations.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2001, 21:56
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #6
Min-Hua Wang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Now can i use MRF model and Eulerian-Granular model in steady state simulation?

Thanks.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2001, 05:28
Default Re: solid-liquid suspension with multi-reference f
  #7
Alain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes you can use these models in steady state simulation but convergence can be very difficult to reach.

As Lanre said, if your tank has no baffles, you do not need a MRF approach, a single rotating frame will be more correct as it can be use in both transient and steady state.

A point about MRF and transient simulation : MRF is a steady state approach so it is true that you may have no significant results if you use it for a transient simulation. Nevertheless you can use it in a transient simulation if you are looking for steady state solution : the intermediate, time dependent, solutions may be not significant, but the converged, steady state solution does.

Best regards

Alain
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2010, 18:22
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Tantular Nurtono
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7
tantular is on a distinguished road
Please observe the solid volume fraction during the iterations. I have problem that the solid volume fractions decreased during the iterations. After the iterations converged, the solid volume fractions is different with the initial value when I patched in the beginning of simulation.
tantular is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Second Derivative Zero - Boundary Condition fu-ki-pa OpenFOAM 10 May 1, 2014 16:26
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux allenzhao OpenFOAM Installation 127 January 30, 2009 20:08
G95 + CGNS Bruno Main CFD Forum 1 January 30, 2007 01:34
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 12, 2001 23:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35.