CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Tet-mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 29, 2002, 15:17
Default Tet-mesh
  #1
Alex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Even for a simple problem (3D) like a flow in a cylinder, I have trouble while using tet-mesh, while I get good results when I use `brick'. I am a new user and I assume I am missing out some detail. I'd be glad if someone could help. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2002, 11:36
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #2
Erwin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tet meshes are difficult to converge, require a lot of cells, and even then the solution is often too diffusive. I only use tet mesh in small transition zones between hex blocks. (Sometimes I wonder if it's not better to just have a non-conformal mesh with only hex cells and eliminate tets altogether. I'd like to hear more opinions on this...)

If you really need tets, then try to have the boundary faces meshed with quads and use a good boundary layer. And always limit your cell skewness to <0.8 if you can.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2002, 11:47
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #3
Giacomo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with Erwin (in particular for boundary layer), but have you used second order upwind? Have you check the volume of the tets at the center of your cylinder? It should not be too large.

Giacomo
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2002, 07:58
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #4
l.g.patil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi Giacomo, you mean to say that, for tet-mesh we should go for second order upwind? tell me more about this. bye
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2002, 05:56
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #5
Giacomo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Using tet-mesh the solution is often too diffusive, that is "takes some errors" because of the fluid flow direction.

In order to reduce this problem you have to use the second order upwind discretization. See solution controls panel help, or see manuals.

Giacomo
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2002, 14:03
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #6
l.g.patil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
got good results thk's for good hints. bye
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2002, 22:09
Default Re: Tet-mesh
  #7
PK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anyone have studied the diffussive effects of Tet-mesh under laminar as well as turbulent conditions? I generally use Tet-mesh because of ease of meshing (I use Fluent). And difficulty in converging with Tet-mesh is not an issue for me. But my flow geometries are always complex and I can't separate the diffusive efects due to the geometry itself or turbulence or meshing scheme. Any general comments to help decide the meshing under turbulent/laminar conditions? Thanks. PK
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Hexa mesh, curve mesh setup, bunching law Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 November 12, 2014 01:27
[ICEM] Negative volume error in hybrid mesh siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 September 3, 2014 05:25
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
How to control Minximum mesh space? hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07.