# Tet-mesh

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 29, 2002, 15:17 Tet-mesh #1 Alex Guest   Posts: n/a Even for a simple problem (3D) like a flow in a cylinder, I have trouble while using tet-mesh, while I get good results when I use `brick'. I am a new user and I assume I am missing out some detail. I'd be glad if someone could help. Thanks.

 January 30, 2002, 11:36 Re: Tet-mesh #2 Erwin Guest   Posts: n/a Tet meshes are difficult to converge, require a lot of cells, and even then the solution is often too diffusive. I only use tet mesh in small transition zones between hex blocks. (Sometimes I wonder if it's not better to just have a non-conformal mesh with only hex cells and eliminate tets altogether. I'd like to hear more opinions on this...) If you really need tets, then try to have the boundary faces meshed with quads and use a good boundary layer. And always limit your cell skewness to <0.8 if you can.

 January 30, 2002, 11:47 Re: Tet-mesh #3 Giacomo Guest   Posts: n/a I agree with Erwin (in particular for boundary layer), but have you used second order upwind? Have you check the volume of the tets at the center of your cylinder? It should not be too large. Giacomo

 February 1, 2002, 07:58 Re: Tet-mesh #4 l.g.patil Guest   Posts: n/a hi Giacomo, you mean to say that, for tet-mesh we should go for second order upwind? tell me more about this. bye

 February 4, 2002, 05:56 Re: Tet-mesh #5 Giacomo Guest   Posts: n/a Using tet-mesh the solution is often too diffusive, that is "takes some errors" because of the fluid flow direction. In order to reduce this problem you have to use the second order upwind discretization. See solution controls panel help, or see manuals. Giacomo

 February 4, 2002, 14:03 Re: Tet-mesh #6 l.g.patil Guest   Posts: n/a got good results thk's for good hints. bye

 February 4, 2002, 22:09 Re: Tet-mesh #7 PK Guest   Posts: n/a Does anyone have studied the diffussive effects of Tet-mesh under laminar as well as turbulent conditions? I generally use Tet-mesh because of ease of meshing (I use Fluent). And difficulty in converging with Tet-mesh is not an issue for me. But my flow geometries are always complex and I can't separate the diffusive efects due to the geometry itself or turbulence or meshing scheme. Any general comments to help decide the meshing under turbulent/laminar conditions? Thanks. PK

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 November 12, 2014 01:27 siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 September 3, 2014 05:25 Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20 Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21 hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14.