CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Online UDF function library

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 14, 2002, 09:37
Default Online UDF function library
  #1
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why doesn't someone create a repository for fluent UDF functions that can be accessed on the web? When a person find out an obscure function (which is usually the case it seems), they would then be able to submit it to this online database, then it would be available for everyone to use. Or would this be frowned upon by Fluent Inc.?
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 10:05
Default Re: Online UDF function library
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is actually a small UDF ftp repository here at CFD Online. I haven't marketed it very much though so it is still quite small. You can find the repository here:

<A HREF="ftp://ftp.cfd-online.com/fluent">ftp://ftp.cfd-online.com/fluent</A>

To submit new files to the repository upload them by anonymous ftp to:

<A HREF="ftp://ftp.cfd-online.com/incoming">ftp://ftp.cfd-online.com/incoming</A>

and drop me an email describing what the UDF does.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 10:18
Default Re: Online UDF function library
  #3
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The problem is that nobody is contibuting to it. I think this is because people are worried about giving away their secrets. People would be much happier to submit just a function and briefly stating what it does. It would be be much more user friendly (for both function entry and use) if it were html based with entry forms.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 11:05
Default Re: Online UDF function library
  #4
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree that a web based form driven interface would make it more easy to use.

However, if people don't want to share their UDF's a web interface won't help much. The very few UDF's submitted to the ftp repository indicates that this is the case. Or am I wrong, would you guys who write UDF's be prepared to share them by submitting them to this kind of UDF repository?

Is the ftp interface a big problem or just a small inconvenience? I don't want to spend time on developing a web interface if people won't use it anyway.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 11:16
Default Re: Online UDF function library
  #5
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think there is any problem with an FTP site being used as a repository for UDF's at all. It is more than adequate.

The real issue is that we need a place to put the UDF functions we have found but aren't documented by Fluent. For instance, what does F_CO_THREAD(face, thread) do? An ordered list of these functions and what they do would be very useful.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 18:28
Default Re: Online UDF function library
  #6
Greg Perkins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The reason people don't contribute to it, is because it takes a lot of work and really what we want is not so much a udf library but a knowledge of each function macro, library call etc.

When people look at other's udfs they normally are trying to extract specific knowledge about the Fluent code from the udf, rather than being likely to reuse the udf etc. At least that's my opinion.

What I've tried to do, is to answer people's questions on udfs within the forum, rather than contribute much to the udf library. The other reason for this is that, my udfs often require whole slabs of code etc., which I've built - so to distill the udfs into compact tutorial types is not easy. I could post the code, but then that would probably add more confusion. (Take a look at some simple uds stuff I posted overa year ago).

So I don't mind the contributing through the forum etc. as it is.

I have been thinking of developing an "advanced udf" guide myself - not like Fluent "advanced" but really advanced - for over a year. But it takes time - if somebody is keen to help and perhaps sort through some code with me, then maybe qe can discuss it.

regards

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2002, 18:37
Default Re: Online UDF function library - F_C0_THREAD
  #7
Greg Perkins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
ok Bob, here's some explanation:

there are functions F_C0 and F_C1 - these return the cell either side of a face. Each face is connected to two cells, so the C0 and C1 designate these cells.

to use

cell_t c0,c1;

c0 = F_C0(face,face_thread); c1 = F_C1(face,face_thread);

now to get the thread that these cells is on you can do:

t0 = face_thread->t0; t1 = face_thread->t1;

Thus to access cell c0,c1 on the sides of the face (face,face_thread), you would do:

Temp = C_T(c0,t0); Temp = C_T(c1,t1);

These sorts of thinsg are necessary when you want to determine a face flux etc.

Now, what does F_C0_THREAD do, well if you look at mem.h you'll see the definition. Eseentially it returns like face_thread->t0 like above. Similarly fo F_C1_THREAD.

Ie they return the thread of the cell on either side of the face. In shorthand you could acess the temps above using:

Temp = C_T(F_CO(face,face_thread),F_CO_THREAD(face,face_t hread);

and similarly for the c1 cell.

Hope it helps

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11
Version 15 on Mac OS X gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 120 December 2, 2009 11:23
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35
Compilation errors in ThirdPartymallochoard feng_w OpenFOAM Installation 1 January 25, 2009 07:59
C_NNODES UDF 'function' problem Matthew Brannock FLUENT 2 June 21, 2000 22:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01.