 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 25, 2002, 23:08
|
lifting surface vs. CFD
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As part of my masters Thesis, I have to compare my CFD model for the tail surfaces of an airplane with a lifting surface model(vortex lattice).
After that, I use a compresible-viscous model for some other information. To save time I made one 3D mesh in Gambit with a boundry layer for y+=1. The viscous results are all right, but the potential flow model results are not. My question is if it is all right to have a mesh (for Fluent)with so little elements for this invicid & incompresible model. Thanks |
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ICEM CFD 5.0 (Hexa) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface | James Date | CFX | 3 | August 10, 2012 04:47 |
| Internal CFD on a surface model (SW2010) | sw1990 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 4, 2011 19:36 |
| ICEM CFD 5.0 (Tetra) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface | James Date | CFX | 3 | December 24, 2004 07:41 |
| ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 1, 2000 10:07 |
| CFD Symposium (Call for Papers) | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 5, 1998 10:25 |
Linear Mode
