CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

lifting surface vs. CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 26, 2002, 00:08
Default lifting surface vs. CFD
  #1
Rodrigo Madariaga
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As part of my masters Thesis, I have to compare my CFD model for the tail surfaces of an airplane with a lifting surface model(vortex lattice).

After that, I use a compresible-viscous model for some other information.

To save time I made one 3D mesh in Gambit with a boundry layer for y+=1. The viscous results are all right, but the potential flow model results are not.

My question is if it is all right to have a mesh (for Fluent)with so little elements for this invicid & incompresible model.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ICEM CFD 5.0 (Hexa) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface James Date CFX 3 August 10, 2012 04:47
Internal CFD on a surface model (SW2010) sw1990 Main CFD Forum 7 January 4, 2011 20:36
ICEM CFD 5.0 (Tetra) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface James Date CFX 3 December 24, 2004 08:41
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2000 10:07
CFD Symposium (Call for Papers) Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 October 5, 1998 10:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:00.