|March 26, 2002, 00:08||
lifting surface vs. CFD
As part of my masters Thesis, I have to compare my CFD model for the tail surfaces of an airplane with a lifting surface model(vortex lattice).
After that, I use a compresible-viscous model for some other information.
To save time I made one 3D mesh in Gambit with a boundry layer for y+=1. The viscous results are all right, but the potential flow model results are not.
My question is if it is all right to have a mesh (for Fluent)with so little elements for this invicid & incompresible model.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|ICEM CFD 5.0 (Hexa) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface||James Date||CFX||3||August 10, 2012 04:47|
|Internal CFD on a surface model (SW2010)||sw1990||Main CFD Forum||7||January 4, 2011 20:36|
|ICEM CFD 5.0 (Tetra) - Internal Wall/Thin Surface||James Date||CFX||3||December 24, 2004 08:41|
|ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001||Chris R. Kleijn||Main CFD Forum||0||August 1, 2000 10:07|
|CFD Symposium (Call for Papers)||Chris R. Kleijn||Main CFD Forum||0||October 5, 1998 10:25|