cyclone problem

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 23, 2002, 17:21 cyclone problem #1 Jichun Guest   Posts: n/a Hello, everyone, Currently, I am using FLUENT to solve a cyclone problem. I know this is a typical problem that FLUENT can handle using ASM model. My question is that for a cyclone, there are two outlets with pressure_outlet boundary condition. When I turn on the multiphase model, I need to set the volumn fractions for the particulate phase at the outlets. The problem is how can I know the volumn fractions for the particulate phase ahead of time? These values should be obtained by solving this problem. Is there anyone could kindly give me some suggestions on this problem? Thanks a lot.

 April 26, 2002, 20:58 Re: cyclone problem #2 Jin-Wook LEE Guest   Posts: n/a Of course, the values are obtained by solving your problem if you finish the calculation. You don't need to input them. Instead, initial guess with arbitrary value is enough. The exact input(volume fraction) is required if there is backflow. In this case(backflow), CFD(or Fluent) require the input because it is actually 'INLET' because of the backflow. Sincerely, Jinwook

 April 29, 2002, 18:08 Re: cyclone problem #3 Jichun Guest   Posts: n/a I really appreciate your response to my post. Just as you said, if there is a backflow occuring in reality I have to treat it's boundary conditions as pressure_inlet type. The thing is: how can I know the volume fraction ahead of time? Can I set whatever values at that boundary or will these values be updated during the calculation? Again, thanks a lot! Have a nice day! JiChun

 April 29, 2002, 20:43 Re: cyclone problem #4 Jin-Wook LEE Guest   Posts: n/a Physically, it is OUTLET. The best way is to make the computational outlet as 'real outlet'. Then you don't need to input them. Instead, Fluent calculate the value even though you give any value, which is only initial guess. Otherwise(if there is backflow through the part domain of outlet or full domain of outlet), the computational iutlet is physically partly inlet or fully inlet. Then, unfortunately, there is no way to predict the value. It is nature and it is CFD. As we can simply guess, we should input the all values for inlet, the same situation for the backflow outlet which is physically inlet(partly or fully). So, if you don't have the boundary condition for the value of outlet where is backflow, you should make the outlet as 'real outlet'. The simple approach to make the outlet as 'real outlet' is to extend the computational domain to the far downstream in order to prevent backflow. If you live in Korea, you can touch me by, 016-723-8750. Sincerely, Jinwook

 May 16, 2002, 04:43 Re: cyclone problem #5 cwflying Guest   Posts: n/a Could you tell me which boundary conditions you applied to the aircore?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post venkataramana OpenFOAM 3 December 1, 2013 08:30 St.Pacholak OpenFOAM 9 November 22, 2011 11:02 ParodDav CFX 5 April 29, 2007 19:13 kharnab FLUENT 1 April 16, 2007 09:24 Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 14:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:58.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top