# Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 12, 2002, 06:49 Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited #1 David Yang Guest   Posts: n/a I meet such a problem during Fluent carrying a calculation: "Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited to 1e+5 in กมกมกมกมกมกม cells" till the calculation achieves convergence. 1.I have not change the default Max limitation of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio in Fluent; 2.to the same model and the same settings, standard k-epsilon model and RNG k-epsilon model can achieve convergence, but RSM model can not; 3.the problem of grid can be eliminable; 4.I think the initial setting of turbulence parameters causes it. My model is a simulation of wind tunnel test, incompressible, and I give the k, epsilon explicitly. The referring materials available are the turbulence intensity and average velocity of inlet, so I can get the k value from these two parameters. It is about 5.8. When I determine the value of epsilon, I consult a formula applied by Fluent help, epsilon=(delta_K/U*L), while delta_K is the approximate decay of k across the flow domain. And epsilon is about 0.02 from this formula. "When using this method to estimate epsilon, you should also check the resulting turbulent viscosity ratio to make sure that it is not too largeกฑ, and I check it. The resulting turbulent viscosity ratio is about e+7~8. It exceeds the default Max limitation of turbulent viscosity ratio in Fluent. So I think it is the reason that prompts appears during calculation. I am a novice, and I don't understand the meaning of limiting turbulent viscosity ratio well. I have several questions: 1.Epsilon could be calculated based on turbulence length scale. Some material says the integral scale of turbulence is equal to the turbulence length scale. Is this right? I think these two are different. 2.To the simulation of flow around high buildings in the bottom of atmosphere B.L., which method is appropriate in determining turbulence parameters and what the approximate value of epsilon is? 3.To my problem, what the reasonable Turbulent Viscosity Ratio limitation is? 3X.

 May 12, 2002, 16:53 Re: Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited #2 Steve Guest   Posts: n/a K seems very large, do use the a percentage or a fraction for the turbulence intensity (it should be a fraction) i.e. 1% = 0.01. A wind tunnel should have virtually zero turbulent viscosity. If you use a length scale then I would use one related to the size of any turbulence screens in the tunnel rather than the integral scale. The buildings are probably within the log-law so I fould use that for your inlet profile.

 May 13, 2002, 00:54 Re: Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited #3 David Yang Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you very much. The buildings are within the log-law zone, if I use turbulence screens as the parameters determining turbulence, how can I determine their relations? Could you give me some direction? 3X.

 June 3, 2002, 06:13 Re: Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited #4 Moritz Guest   Posts: n/a depending on the turbulence model I am also having this problem. in my case it only appears during the beginning of the solution process. ormally I just keep on itterating and after some hundred steps fluent finds its way to the right range for the turbulent viscosity. under my impression increasing the limit of turbulent viscosity (and thereby having less cells "limited") helps speeding up this process. however a value to great leads to divergence, due to the fact, that fluent calculates a really wierd flowfield with huge gradients of turbulent viscosity, temperatur, velocity etc.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Deepak FLUENT 0 December 11, 2008 14:08 Fabio FLUENT 1 August 7, 2008 15:40 cxysohu FLUENT 3 October 5, 2005 05:17 varghese FLUENT 2 November 15, 2003 09:56 xiang FLUENT 3 May 20, 2003 12:46

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14.