 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
May 28, 2002, 14:00
|
Turbomachinery and accuracy
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How accurate is Fluent with turbomachinery or perhaps how close to expected results is it? Within 5 percent or ?
Thanks... |
|
|
||
|
May 28, 2002, 14:32
|
Re: Turbomachinery and accuracy
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That depends entirely on what you want to predict. Pressure distrubtions for on-design points are usually within 5%. However, heat-transfer, off-design losses etc. can easily be much more off.
|
|
|
|
||
|
June 2, 2002, 07:29
|
Re: Turbomachinery and accuracy
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That differs very much. From very good (<<5%) up to very bad (50%) ...
|
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbomachinery oulet | SA | CFX | 3 | October 6, 2008 10:39 |
| Acceptable Accuracy or Error? | Erich | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 2, 2001 13:30 |
| Is SIMPLEC method suitable for turbomachinery? | lhb | Main CFD Forum | 14 | February 15, 2001 19:59 |
| CFD package for Turbomachinery | John | Main CFD Forum | 8 | February 12, 2001 02:37 |
| CFD for turbomachinery | Quentin Roberts | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 6, 1999 01:53 |
Linear Mode
