CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Post Processing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 13, 2002, 04:36
Default Post Processing
  #1
Koorosh MOHAMMADI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear All,

I'm trying to present some 3D graphs of my simulation. Those graphs are about the Absolute Pressure, Total Temperature and Velocities (x,y,z and magnitude) in some plane (SURFACE PELANE) at the middel of my geometry. To control the number of "Level Curves" I prefered to insert "Surface Rakes". Now when I plot for example the values of Z velocity on those rakes, the graphs will be different in respect to whether I switch on the node values or not. Since the node values will present the interpolated data in the faces, the graphs are more smooth and the trends are more clear. But when the node values are swithced off, even though the trend of graphs is the same, but they are not as smooth as previouse one (I have near 1,500,000 3D elements in geometry and they are enough suitable and the simulation seems to be converged.)

Now what you suggest? The graphs should be presented by use of NODE VALUES or with out them. Is it important that if I use NO NODES, I smooth the data by use of another programm?

Best regards

Koorosh
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2002, 06:54
Default Re: Post Processing
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The uninterpolated cell values are of course the most correct values, these are the cell-averages computed by the solver. This gives more information for you as a CFD engineer - you can easily see if you have local stability/convergence problems in some cells etc.

By interpolating the cell values to the nodes you get a smoother plot with nicer contours. What you do when you interpolate to the nodes is essentially to perform a smoothing of your calculated CFD results. This hides local grid-related problems and if you want to show plots to non CFD people this might be better - things simply look smoother. It looks better than you actual results are though.

I use node-values in publications and presentation material to non-CFD people, but I always use cell values when I look at the results myself or want to discuss them with fellow CFD colleagues.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ansys Post processing ano999 ANSYS 1 May 27, 2011 16:24
NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX sakalido CFX 1 April 15, 2011 14:07
post processing for KIVA dirga Main CFD Forum 5 April 23, 2009 10:58
Post Processing in FEM Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 0 April 26, 2004 11:59
post processing in CFD MANISH BHARGAVA Main CFD Forum 0 October 17, 1998 20:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:20.