|
[Sponsors] |
August 7, 2002, 16:47 |
VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, anyone has experience with this kind of simulations in fluent?
I'm simulating a liquid-gas system in which particles are released in the liquid only. I've made some simulations but would like to ask a few questions for which I'm concerned. Particularly if somebody knows a criteria on how fine the mesh must be and how big must be the length of path for the particle trajectories calculation. Thanks for any help. Newbie |
|
August 7, 2002, 20:47 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
HI, Whats your particle size ? Is your mesh size smaller than particle size while you are trying to track the free surface? Are you considering the properties of the surface of the particles ??!!
DC |
|
August 7, 2002, 20:51 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks for your answer,
The particle size is 8 micras that is smaller than the smallest mesh element. I'm not considering the properties of the surface of the particles. Hope this clarifies my question. Thanks again. |
|
August 7, 2002, 21:21 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi New1 How big is your domain ? Are doing 3d? To track 1 mm bubble (2d), I used 20 cells in 1 mm. The results looked sensible, however didn't validate though. DC
|
|
August 7, 2002, 21:27 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, its a 2D simulation, my domain is about 2x1 milimeters. I'm using much finer mesh than yours, but I don't know if I'm doing Ok. When I use a smaller integration step for the particles tracking trajectories looks Ok. But I still have doubts and the fluent manual is not too clear.
Thanks for any comment new1 |
|
August 8, 2002, 00:56 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
Sorry for disturbing, but I did not know that the size of the cells must be larger than the size of particles! For DPM modelling, what is usually the standard for the size of cells in comparison to the size of the particles? I'm tracking something at is 1e-4m, the length of my cell is only 0.1m... I could not increase the size further, since the memory space it will take up will be so much larger. |
|
August 8, 2002, 11:52 |
Re: VOF-DPM anyone?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Julie; That's one of my doubts, sorry for not be able to help.
Maybe someone with better skills and experience can help. Regards. New1 |
|
August 12, 2009, 15:10 |
|
#8 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
How about checking the values of y plus?
Though, what flow model do you use for the continuum phase? |
|
October 27, 2014, 17:15 |
Vof_dpm
|
#9 |
Member
azna
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi ,
I am using VOF-DPM approach to model air bubbles into the lake, I'm getting higher terminal velocity than using eulerian approach, I specified air velocity in the boundary condition ( Inlet Velocity) and also in the DPM part. I was wondering can somebody help me on this ? ( is there any similar papaer or tutorial for this case? Thanks a lot |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Volume fraction of dispersed phase to determine DPM, VOF, Mixture model | Mohsin | FLUENT | 5 | March 5, 2018 07:47 |
how to couple VOF and DPM ?? | cfdiscool | FLUENT | 6 | March 16, 2016 00:11 |
VOF and DPM together | xiana | ANSYS | 0 | October 28, 2009 11:52 |
DPM or VOF model? | Benjamin Behey | FLUENT | 2 | December 2, 2008 18:37 |
Possibility of combining DPM and VOF | Kelly | FLUENT | 0 | September 24, 2007 16:12 |