|
[Sponsors] |
August 20, 2002, 02:47 |
Do I Break up "Air" in Species Transport?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
When I'm doing a species transport modelling without any chemical reactions involved, eg spread of ammonia gas in a room, thus the mixture is air and ammonia gas. Is it better to "break up" air into its main constituents eg N2,O2,CO2,vapour or do is it better to "lump" its constituent into a single species material as "air"? |
|
August 20, 2002, 16:20 |
Re: Do I Break up "Air" in Species Transport?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Julie,
It depends what you want to do. If the O2 (or other components) will not be modeled as reacting, then including them as separate components will just take extra computing time. One thing with CFD modeling, it is pretty easy to try different alternatives. If it works out, great; if it doesn't, sometimes you learn from that as well. |
|
August 21, 2002, 00:15 |
Re: Do I Break up "Air" in Species Transport?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok thanks!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modelling Biomass Combustion via Species Transport | Racheal | FLUENT | 39 | January 8, 2022 07:42 |
Fixed Bed Gasifier, Species Transport Problem | therandomestname | FLUENT | 12 | January 4, 2019 07:08 |
Please help!! Patch and Species transport | Julie | FLUENT | 5 | August 3, 2016 03:10 |
species transport in water | lyn | FLUENT | 1 | December 12, 2007 18:15 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 12:24 |