CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By rk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 4, 2002, 15:46
Default CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!
  #1
XIAOYI LI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am doing simulation that there maybe a reverse flow occurs at outlet. I am using pressure outlet boundary conditon. The results can't get converged.. Any one have experience with the reverse flow at outlet? Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2002, 16:00
Default Re: CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!
  #2
Anders
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sure, that can be a problem. The classic answer to that is to try and extend your domain so that any potential recirculation resides within your domain and not across a boundary, i.e. to extrude some layers downstream if it is a pipe-like geometry, or to build some box onto the end to simulate the rest of the world... Is that possible?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2002, 21:15
Default Re: CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!
  #3
XIAOYI LI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
THANKS A LOT! I WILL TRY IT TOMORROW.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2002, 10:00
Default Re: CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!
  #4
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have done a lot of work with reverse flow at a pressure outlet. What type of discretization are you using? I find in most of my simulations that I need to use second order upwind rather than first order to achieve the desired level of reverse flow. Maybe you could try this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2002, 13:23
Default Re: CAN'T CONVERGE WITH REVERSE FLOW AT OUTLET!
  #5
Bharath
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello ..

I have been working on Spray modelling and It is required to obtain a Uniformly Distributed Fine Spray at the Exit of the nozzle.To achieve this..I tried to extend my nozzle exit by constructing an Visualisation area of order 100mm*60 mm ( and gave pressure outlet conditions at the edes )while my nozzle dimensions are of the order 1-5 mm....do u think such a big Visualization area is required to see the flow at the exit ?..would it have any impact on the Convergence of the program and hence the modelling ??

Thanks

Bharath
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2002, 13:17
Default SECOND ORDER UPWIND DOES WORK! THANKS
  #6
lixiaoyi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This does work! Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2002, 09:43
Default Re: SECOND ORDER UPWIND DOES WORK! THANKS
  #7
rk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When there is a reversal flow at the pressure outlet, the static pressure mentioned at the outlet will be taken as total pressure. So essentially, the pressure outlet acts as pressure inlet. But the velocity component will be taken as normal to the boundary. This creates problem if there is a significant tangential component at the outlet. The above mentioned assumption destroys the other 2 components, tangential & radial. Moreover, you will observe different flow field at the outlet if there is physically reverse flow at the outlet.

So only solution is to extend the domain little bit faraway and define that as pressure outlet. When you look at the results, create a surface at the actual outlet!

Thanks,

rk
harsh_999 likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2002, 12:27
Default Re: SECOND ORDER UPWIND DOES WORK! THANKS
  #8
Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, this is a question...

I modeled a square box and put in boundary conditions at 2 opposites ends. One was a total pressure, and the other was a static pressure (lower than the total pressure). -- I had already set my operating pressure to zero earlier, so all these are gauge pressures.

I keep getting 'reversed flow' during my iterations. I'm not sure if lixiaoyi was purposely trying to force reversed flow at her exit, but in MY case, I don't expect reversed flow...

Did I make any careless mistakes somewhere? Or is it because I'm using a square box, and that I should try lengthening my box like what rk suggested? Or are my boundary conditions dodgy in the first place?

Please advise Gracias.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2011, 07:57
Red face Reverse flow
  #9
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 7
siddharameshwara is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rk
;103797
When there is a reversal flow at the pressure outlet, the static pressure mentioned at the outlet will be taken as total pressure. So essentially, the pressure outlet acts as pressure inlet. But the velocity component will be taken as normal to the boundary. This creates problem if there is a significant tangential component at the outlet. The above mentioned assumption destroys the other 2 components, tangential & radial. Moreover, you will observe different flow field at the outlet if there is physically reverse flow at the outlet.

So only solution is to extend the domain little bit faraway and define that as pressure outlet. When you look at the results, create a surface at the actual outlet!

Thanks,

rk
Hello

could you please explain in detail what do you mean by that? Right now i am facing the same problem
siddharameshwara is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2011, 05:53
Smile
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 7
siddharameshwara is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE=rk
;103797]When there is a reversal flow at the pressure outlet, the static pressure mentioned at the outlet will be taken as total pressure. So essentially, the pressure outlet acts as pressure inlet. But the velocity component will be taken as normal to the boundary. This creates problem if there is a significant tangential component at the outlet. The above mentioned assumption destroys the other 2 components, tangential & radial. Moreover, you will observe different flow field at the outlet if there is physically reverse flow at the outlet.

So only solution is to extend the domain little bit faraway and define that as pressure outlet. When you look at the results, create a surface at the actual outlet!

Thanks,

Hi rk,

Even i am facing the same problem. I tried to extrude the outlet but invain. Could you please tell me the reason i didnt understand "But the velocity component will be taken as normal to the boundary. This creates problem if there is a significant tangential component at the outlet." this statement
siddharameshwara is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 16:39
Red face Reverse flow problem
  #11
New Member
 
Dinesh
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 7
Dinesh_Dhande is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
;103645
I have done a lot of work with reverse flow at a pressure outlet. What type of discretization are you using? I find in most of my simulations that I need to use second order upwind rather than first order to achieve the desired level of reverse flow. Maybe you could try this.
Dear Tom,
I am simulating water flow through journal bearing. The shaft radius is 50mm and the bearing radius is 50.43 mm. The flow domain is clearance between shaft (rotary member with velocity 108.91 rad/sec) and bearing (stationary member.) The length is 200mm. I am using segregated solver and the flow is laminar. The inlet BC is 50 KPa and outlet BC is 42kPa. When i simulate the system i am getting reverse flow first on outlet and then inlet. Kindly help.
Dinesh_Dhande is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 16:43
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Dinesh
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 7
Dinesh_Dhande is on a distinguished road
Dear Tom,
I am simulating water flow through journal bearing. The shaft radius is 50mm and the bearing radius is 50.43 mm. The flow domain is clearance between shaft (rotary member with velocity 108.91 rad/sec) and bearing (stationary member.) The length is 200mm. I am using segregated solver and the flow is laminar. The inlet BC is 50 KPa and outlet BC is 42kPa. When i simulate the system i am getting reverse flow first on outlet and then inlet. Kindly help.
Dinesh_Dhande is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFDesign V11 -- Reverse flow at outlet maruthiv Autodesk Simulation CFD 1 June 17, 2011 09:38
Pressure outlet in two-phase flow in horizontal 2D channel AlmostSurelyRob Main CFD Forum 0 November 17, 2010 08:32
Reversed flow at pressure outlet Seeker Phil FLUENT 9 January 2, 2010 06:21
Reverse Flow at Rotating Pipe Outlet vismech STAR-CCM+ 1 August 11, 2009 10:38
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22.