|
[Sponsors] |
March 24, 2003, 13:28 |
DPM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Has anyone ever heard of the 'saltate' or 'saltation' boundary condition for walls, as opposed to reflect, trap, escape etc?
If so, can you please tell me how I can set this boundary condition. Thanks DAE |
|
March 24, 2003, 17:39 |
Re: DPM
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I have been working by DPM model for long time and I have ever hear such term "saltate". Perhaps it means that you can set the normal and tangetial components of the reflect boundary as a function that you could write in a UDF. Therefore, I guess you can write a UDF which provide a periodic function for the normal component of the reflect boundary. Best regards Alex Munoz |
|
March 25, 2003, 19:51 |
Re: DPM
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In Version 2 (from the 80's) there was a saltation boundary condition for particles. If I remember correctly, the idea was that part of the particle mass (say water) was transferred to the continuous phase and the rest (salt) was left behind.
I don't know if this boundary condition continues on in Versions 4, 5, and 6, but it could be easily replicated. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM and UDS | mighelone | FLUENT | 0 | June 3, 2011 08:27 |
DPM modeling | Mohsin | FLUENT | 0 | March 31, 2010 23:11 |
DPM - do the particles affect the liquid? | Nikhil Dani | FLUENT | 0 | January 1, 2009 12:58 |
slow after mesh for enhanced wall treat DPM | joshkemp | FLUENT | 0 | May 1, 2007 18:20 |
compatibity LES with DPM | Alex Munoz | FLUENT | 0 | March 26, 2003 22:13 |