CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Symmetry

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 30, 2003, 03:43
Default Symmetry
  #1
Tobi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi everybody!

Please can you give me a answer to my question:

I have a 3D-Volume with a velocity inlet (calculated by given massflow)

Now I split the volume and use only a quarter to do calculations. I also use symmetry-BC

Are the calculations done for the hole volume or only for a quarter?

With best regards

Tobi
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 08:13
Default Re: Symmetry
  #2
mateus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

If you use the simmetry bc it means that conditions are expected to be the same on the other side of bc (in stedy case). So calculations can be made only for that quater of volume - this speeds up he calculation. The flow parameters (velocity, pressure field...) in the other 3/4 of the volume are simmetric to the calculated ones.

regards

MATEUS
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 09:37
Default Re: Symmetry
  #3
Karl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What about non-steady case?
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 10:00
Default Re: Symmetry
  #4
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The calculation is done only on 1/4 of the volume.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 10:08
Default Re: Symmetry
  #5
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If the flow you're modeling has unsteady characteristics, like gas flow in a liquid-gas column or granular solid flow in a gas-solid flow, you shouldn't use symmetry condition.

You can apply symmetry condition for example to a flow of water in a straight pipe, even if you do an unsteady calculation, because you expect the flow behaviour to be symmetrical.

If you impose a symmetry condition to a flow with unsteady behaviour you risk to obtain non-physical results.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 10:56
Default Re: Symmetry
  #6
Karl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
But it is correct to use symmetry to model a free-slip wall or free surface (that does not change shape)even in highly transient flows?

I want to use symmetry to model a wall that has free-slip. In this way I want to get rid of a large portion of domain that is far from the region of interest, and I believe the flow beyond the placement of the symmetry condition has little effect on the remainder of flow, even though the flow is highly time dependent everywhere. (The velocity normal to the placement of the free-slip wall is approximately 0, even in the true flow situation)
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 16:14
Default Re: Symmetry
  #7
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you can use symmetry.

If I'm not wrong, your flow is transient but also symmetrical, so if you use symmetry, you don't impose an unreal condition.

Hi

ap

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2003, 17:17
Default Re: Symmetry
  #8
Alex Munoz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

From experiments, I have ever seen any periodical flow that presents symetry. I guess you could made this asumption. However, you should be aware of the reality!

Regards

Alex Munoz
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2003, 09:43
Default Re: Symmetry
  #9
zalhit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
maybe symmetry show 1/2, but not show pipe or cube
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Blocking and Symmetry BrolY ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 32 August 24, 2012 03:13
Properly using symmetry with both CFX and ANSYS workbench for a FSI analysis, help! Cirion0000 CFX 0 July 6, 2009 14:26
Forces in Symmetry Matt CFX 2 February 25, 2009 06:41
Symmetry plane error in solver Santiago Orrego. CFX 6 January 31, 2007 08:09
radiation and symmetry Mark FLUENT 2 November 4, 2004 14:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:00.