# sliding meshes with periodic BC's

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 9, 2003, 02:33 sliding meshes with periodic BC's #1 Dan Brozozowski Guest   Posts: n/a Section 9.5.3 of the User's Guide says the following: "If you are modelling a rotor/stator geometry using periodicity, the periodic angle of the mesh around the rotor blade(s) must be the same as that of the mesh around the stationary vane(s)." I'm trying to model a single rotor/stator section of an axial pump in Fluent 6 using the sliding mesh technique. (Right now I'm just doing a 2D model at the midspan of the blades.) My sliding mesh consists of a single channel from the rotor section and a single channel from the stator section. The problem is that the rotor and stator have different numbers of blades (i.e. the rotor blades are spaced farther apart than the stator blades) so the interfacing boundaries of the two meshes have different lengths. So, for the reasons listed above from ing user's manual, Fluent does not accept this mesh. It seems like there must be a way to solve this without modelling all the rotor/stator blades. Any suggestions? Thanks! Dan

 June 26, 2003, 03:35 Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's #2 senthil Guest   Posts: n/a hi, Before answering your question, could you plese tell me why you choose sliding mesh theroy. Its for unsteady case and moreover to capture the stong interaction of stator and rotor. I don't know much about the sliding mesh theory. But i'm also working on rotor stator problem using mixing plane theroy. THis you can try out, but only this is this is steady state anlalysis. And this will take care of diffenent interface lenghts (mixing plane). senthil.

 June 26, 2003, 14:01 Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's #3 Dan Brzozowski Guest   Posts: n/a Senthil, Yes, we are looking specifically at strong rotor-stator interaction. This page contains a good description of the machine I'm modelling: http://www.me.jhu.edu/~lefd/turbo/turbo.htm As I said before it's an axial turbopump with 12 rotor blades and 17 stator blades. The animations on the page are from the actual experimental data observed using Particle Image Velocimety (but this is a CFD forurm so I'll just leave it at that...) Should I consider using the mixing plane approach? Can I still do unsteady analysis with that? Dan

 June 27, 2003, 07:10 Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's #4 senthil Guest   Posts: n/a Dan, I look at the site you mentioned. Its great work. Since you are intrested in rotor-stator interaction, Mixing plane will not work, as it is a steadt state asumption. The sliding mesh model is appropriate model to capture the interaction. Senthil.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post mawi01 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 March 13, 2016 14:10 ivanddd Main CFD Forum 1 April 19, 2011 13:30 Luigi_ STAR-CCM+ 1 January 26, 2011 05:48 andy.eco FLUENT 2 March 26, 2010 03:02 anuhar Main CFD Forum 0 May 4, 2009 03:45

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:30.