Free form surface in fluent, two ways? -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

June 13, 2003, 16:36	Free form surface in fluent, two ways?	#1
Rajil Saraswat Guest Posts: n/a	I am trying to model the flow in a tank and want to specify the free form liquid at the top of the tank. I tried some searching on this forum and came up with two results. 1. Define the surface as a wall and then put the Shear stresses to 0 for x and y. 2. Define the surface with symmetry boundary condition. Can you please suggest which is better approach, as for 2, is it correct for setting the surface as boundary because i thought that symmetry meant just a 'mirror' in fluent. Thanks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
UDF Defining VOF Free Surface at Outlet	Alex	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	13	August 8, 2012 16:50
CFX convergence issues with free surface	adenlan	CFX	3	September 2, 2011 06:43
Hydrofoil modeling near free surface in fluent	Mojtaba Lajevardi	FLUENT	2	June 7, 2008 04:59
free surface display	novice	Siemens	5	August 4, 2004 01:07
Modeling Free Surface Flows	Elliot Schwartz	Main CFD Forum	5	August 25, 1998 21:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:53.