CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Ungent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 7, 2003, 10:46
Default Ungent
  #1
ranran
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear All

I am simulating the flow through a tube, in which I used the parallel mesh style for border and a triagnle style for lumen in Gambit? Who does know the advantages of the parallel mesh style in comparison with the triangle mesh style for the tube border. How should I select the mesh style for the border in a tube.

Thank you very much.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2003, 12:58
Default Re: Ungent
  #2
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you refers to structured hexaedral grids when you talk about parallel mesh, right?

Structured grids allows you to reduce numerical diffusion, if cells are aligned with the flow, which is impossible using unstructured grids.

Also, if your geometry is simple, a structured grid usually has less nodes, so it allows you to reduce you computational time.

If your geometry is complex, however, genereting a structured mesh is difficult and time consuming, because you have to find the proper domain decomposition, which allows you to apply a hex mesh to all its parts.

If you have to model a single pipe, you could try using a structured hexaedral mesh. Many books suggest to split the volume in a central brick and in four lateral parts, in order to have a uniform grid in the center of the pipe.

The section will be something like this (sorry for poor quality, hope you understand)

\_/

(|_|)

/ \

Mesh the internal edges, then apply the submap scheme to the lateral parts of the section and the map scheme to the central square. Specify how much nodes you want along the axis of the pipe, then simply mesh the five volumes in which your cilinder is splitted.

Hope this will be useful

Hi

ap

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2003, 17:51
Default Re: Ungent
  #3
ranran
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you very much. I am going to mesh a branched tube for fluid flow simulation inside tube. Each branch has less diameter than the trunk. Do I need to split it into three parts from the branching point?
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2003, 22:33
Default Re: Ungent
  #4
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Meshing a branched pipe using structured grids is not easy.

If you have a T intersection, you can find an example in GAMBIT tutorials. There should be more info on some CFD book.

If you have something like

>--

it's easier and faster to use an unstructured mesh, which allows to mesh your domain almost directly. You can specify the number of nodes you want along its edges.

Hi

ap
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2003, 03:31
Default Re: Ungent
  #5
Cathy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have experience that solution on structured grid is easier to attain.

Cathy
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2003, 05:48
Default Re: Ungent
  #6
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sometimes unstructured grids have some convergence problem.

However, if the quality of the mesh is good enough, you shouldn't notice particular difficulties obtaining the solution.

Hi

ap
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:56.