# cylindrical coordinate vs cartesian coordinate

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 29, 2003, 17:28 cylindrical coordinate vs cartesian coordinate #1 Lam Guest   Posts: n/a I face a problem in comparing my CFD results (Fluent) with my LDA measures(Dantec) because they use cylindrical coordinate and cartesian coordinate respectively. Can I change the Fluent from a cylindrical coordinate to a cartesian coordinate?

 December 1, 2003, 04:52 Re: cylindrical coordinate vs cartesian coordinate #2 thomas Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I dunno if it is what you are looking for but here is the linked between the cartesian and cylindrical coord. in fluent Z -> X r -> Y theta -> Z You can certainly find more informations on the fluent user web site (online documentation). Cheers, thomas

 May 1, 2013, 18:33 #3 New Member   Hadi kafil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Istanbul Posts: 8 Rep Power: 5 Hi, I'm solving a natural convection problem in Fluent 13, but I want to model a 3D symetric cylindrical shape in 2-d. I assume (r=x, z=y, theta=0). How can I change my coordinate from Cartesian to cylindrical???

May 10, 2013, 04:56
#4
New Member

Mukesh
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by grayeagle Hi, I'm solving a natural convection problem in Fluent 13, but I want to model a 3D symetric cylindrical shape in 2-d. I assume (r=x, z=y, theta=0). How can I change my coordinate from Cartesian to cylindrical???
Go to define/solver...
change your problem from 2D to aisymmetric. That's it.

Best Wishes,
Mukesh

 May 10, 2013, 09:24 cylinderical coordinate in Fluent #5 New Member   Hadi kafil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Istanbul Posts: 8 Rep Power: 5 I have done it. Draw my half shape, and define the symmetry axis as "axis" in Boundary condition, and select 'Axisymmetry' in define-solver, but there is an error : "Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum"

May 10, 2013, 13:01
#6
New Member

Mukesh
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by grayeagle I have done it. Draw my half shape, and define the symmetry axis as "axis" in Boundary condition, and select 'Axisymmetry' in define-solver, but there is an error : "Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum"
for STEADY PROBLEM: you can try reducing relaxation factor of momentum equation from 0.7 to some lower value i.e, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 [solve/controls...]

for UNSTAEDY PROBLEM: reduce the size of time step

 May 10, 2013, 18:49 #7 New Member   Hadi kafil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Istanbul Posts: 8 Rep Power: 5 I have reduced relaxation factor of momentum equation from 0.7 to 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, ... but there is still that error. I even close the momentum equation (Solution control-equation) but this time the error was " Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature " !

May 10, 2013, 21:22
#8
New Member

Mukesh
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by grayeagle I have reduced relaxation factor of momentum equation from 0.7 to 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, ... but there is still that error. I even close the momentum equation (Solution control-equation) but this time the error was " Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature " !
Try reducing RF for energy term from 1 to 0.7,0.8.
Else there is some problem with BC.
BTW what is problem you are trying to solve.

 May 11, 2013, 09:53 #9 Senior Member   OJ Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: United Kindom Posts: 475 Rep Power: 12 Can you post BCs please? OJ

 May 11, 2013, 12:39 #10 New Member   Hadi kafil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Istanbul Posts: 8 Rep Power: 5 I have a rectangle ( a cross section of cylinder) I wanna solve Natural convection (and then solidification) problem. I have a temperature gradient in right and left wall (my rectangle is 40x100). and this UDF is my boundary condition in left and right wall... I solve it in cartesian coordinate, but in Cylindrical, I have problem. #include "udf.h" DEFINE_PROFILE(temperature_profile, thread, index) { real x[ND_ND]; /* this will hold the position vector */ real y; face_t f; begin_f_loop(f,thread) { F_CENTROID(x,f,thread); y = x[1]; F_PROFILE(f, thread, index) =((1000*y)/2)+1223; } end_f_loop(f,thread) }

 May 11, 2013, 13:05 #11 New Member   Hadi kafil Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Istanbul Posts: 8 Rep Power: 5 I solved this problem in Planer (2d space) without any problem. I reduce the Under-relaxation factor for energy and momentum. I aslo try to solve it Transient. But there is still this error. for momentum equation: " Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum " for ener Last edited by grayeagle; May 14, 2013 at 10:02.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post cfd2010 Main CFD Forum 0 June 9, 2010 21:55 bharath CFX 0 June 6, 2010 21:43 tht FLUENT 0 September 6, 2007 05:46 Manoj FLUENT 0 December 15, 2005 10:43 J.H. Lee. Phoenics 2 March 28, 2003 05:28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:31.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top