|
[Sponsors] |
February 23, 2004, 07:20 |
Realizable and Standard K-E Difference
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am wondering if anyone can point me to a reference or could explain to me the main differences between the realizable and the standard k-epsilon model, in respect of modelling a two dimensional mixing elbow as is available in the Fluent tutorial.
And in your personal opinion which you would recommend and why? Thank you Andrew |
|
February 24, 2004, 15:33 |
Re: Realizable and Standard K-E Difference
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Here is the reference of the people that made the model:
SHIH, T-H., LIOU, W. W., SHABBIR, A., YANG, Z. ZHU, J. 1995. A new k-e eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & fluids. 24: 227-238. Here is a reference of an application of the model: CHAN, T. L., DONG, G., LEUNG, C. W., CHEUNG, C. S. and HUNG, W. T. 2002. Validation of a two-dimensional pollutant dispersion model in an isolated street canyon. Atmospheric environment. 36: 861-872. I've found that the realizable ke has slightly more agreeable results than ske and takes about the same amount of time for iteration (compared to RNG). I think the main difference is that the eddy viscosity coefficient is calculated rather than used from a constant. Hope this helps. Cheers, Tim. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Realizable k-epsilon model k-residual | vmartin | FLUENT | 1 | May 12, 2017 11:15 |
Question about standard wall functions. | George | FLUENT | 1 | February 16, 2007 16:38 |
About the RNG and Realizable turbulence models | Freeman | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 3, 2006 04:41 |
what's the difference between the Standard and Rea | Lu | FLUENT | 2 | July 12, 2004 06:16 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 03:27 |