 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 12, 2004, 02:04
|
ICEM CFD Modules
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We consider purchasing ICEM CFD Hex to replace Gambit for the generation of stuctured meshes. The vendor advises us to purchase ICEM CFD Basic also, which functions as the platform for the Hex module. Is that so? The price ICEM CFD Basic is comparable to the Hex module, which is beyond our budget.
Those who are the users of ICEM CFD please advise. Thank you. |
|
|
||
|
March 12, 2004, 14:37
|
Re: ICEM CFD Modules
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would suggest staying with Gambit - the meshing for hex is much more straight forward... I believe the GAMBIT hex mesher to be much fast then ICEM's
never mind GAMBIT isn't any "extra" $$ -- ICEM's strongest selling point is the ability to handle poor CAD geometry... |
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [ICEM] Icem CFD on Linux | mechanicaldesign | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 7 | March 11, 2021 19:44 |
| Need help icem cfd | kakhtar | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 25 | January 31, 2017 01:09 |
| CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 19, 2015 23:40 |
| Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise | Wieland | FLUENT | 2 | April 15, 2012 06:28 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
Linear Mode
