CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Absorption Coefficient

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2004, 09:31
Default Absorption Coefficient
  #1
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I'm having trouble getting a converged solution for radiation in a furnace. Combustion is modelled using eddy dissipation with ke turbulence model. I have obtained a second order solution to the combustion flow field but can't get converged radiation. I'm using DO model with default values.

I know the absorption coefficient to be approximately 0.35 in the furnace drum, where the flame exists, but the absorption coefficient drops to zero in some parts of the model domain. The point at which the absorption Coeff. is equal to zero is at the material discharge away from the flame.

My question is, can I apply a constant absoprtion coefficient value of 0.35 without effecting the accuracy of the solution too much??? Or can I appy constant absorption coefficient to certain sections and WSGGM to others?

Thanks for your help,

Mark
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2004, 18:35
Default Re: Absorption Coefficient
  #2
Otilia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Check if there is a combo box next to the absorption coefficient in the materials panel. If that is the case you can use a UDF to define a value of the absorption coefficient as a function of grid coordinates.

However, I do not think that this will help with your convergence problems. Check underrelaxation factors and reaction schemes. Are you using pdf? If yes, check pdf file.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2004, 12:55
Default Re: Absorption Coefficient
  #3
Allan Walsh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What do you mean by not converge? Energy balance is off? Residuals are high? Wall radiant heat fluxes change?

Radiation may be the last to converge. Perhaps there is no steady-solution to your problem. What sort of accuracy do you need?

I have used the WSSGG model in models of more than 50 different furnaces, albeit with the P1 radiation model, and have not seen the determination of the absorbtion coefficent to be a source of instability.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't set absorption coefficient for inert particle lauripar FLUENT 1 May 9, 2012 15:09
A question of absorption coefficient units ljwbuaa Main CFD Forum 1 August 4, 2011 02:45
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method Suzzn CFX 18 October 2, 2009 04:18
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57.