|April 1, 2004, 22:09||
Meshing Techniques & k-omega turbulence model
Recently I used three different grid generation technique to simulate for external aero for a simplified model. Those three techniques are 1)fully hex, 2) Fully Tet and 3) Hybrid (Hex close to the wall and Tet everywhere else). I did grid adaptations and achieved grid independence. The final results showed that hybrid mesh gave the closest comparison to experimental data. I used std k-epsilon with non-equilibrium wall model.
Why is it so? Hex should give the better results due to minimum skewness in its grid shape.
How come k-omega turbulence model does not come with a 2-layer wall model option?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|k-omega-SST model (OF 1.6) - turbulent flat plate||cboss||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||25||August 9, 2016 09:53|
|Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||18||March 3, 2015 06:36|
|SimpleFoam case with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model implemented||nedved||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||November 30, 2014 23:43|
|KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet||philippose||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||30||August 4, 2010 10:26|
|v2-f turbulence model in CFX?||flga||CFX||14||November 23, 2006 07:12|