|
[Sponsors] |
April 27, 2004, 11:52 |
method for best approximation?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to ask your help to select the best method for solving a flow problem.
There is an air channel 10mm x 2mm x 1mm and it is heated in a part of a channel. The air speed is between 0m/s and 50 m/s. I would like to modell the effect of the heating to the velocity field and to the turbulence. Do you think it will good approximate the real circumstances if I set the air material properties the following way: I set density as "ideal-gas" and set both viscosity and thermal conductivity as "kinetic-theory"? What do you think which turbulence method gives the best approximation? Thank you for your answer! |
|
April 28, 2004, 01:48 |
Re: method for best approximation?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
In your case, the mesh needs to be very fine near all walls and the material property is set as a actual gas. "ideal-gas-law" is the good appoximation and the other properties should be a function of temperature or "kinetic theory" as your remarks. I think "LES" is the best model. Thanks FJ |
|
April 28, 2004, 10:22 |
Re: method for best approximation?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your answer!
I will read books on turbulence soon... Maybe you know a simply answer so I put on the question. If there is an real flow thing and I want to modell it with Fluent how do I know the best parameters for turbulence specification (at inlet velocity parametrisation)? And if I select intensity and length scale, which values gives the best approximations to the real circumstances? Could you give me some suggestions please? Thank you in advance! |
|
April 28, 2004, 18:35 |
Re: method for best approximation?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Laszlo:
answer to your question is in the online help for fluent 6.1 please read chapter 6. Boundary Conditions |
|
April 29, 2004, 04:17 |
Re: method for best approximation?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Your answer was useful! Thanks! In velocity inlet part I read I shouldn't use velocity inlet with compressible flows.
At chapter 6.2.2. there is a calculation method for Turbulence Length Scale in duct flow. It was helpful too. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] discretizer - gmshToFoam | Andyjoe | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 14, 2012 04:35 |
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method | m-fry | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 20, 2010 14:40 |
Code for most powerfull FDV Method | D.S.Nasan | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 4, 2008 02:08 |
Help about the preconditioner in gmres method | Dan Gao | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 5, 2008 01:18 |
hess-smith method and fvm method | yangqing | FLUENT | 0 | March 20, 2002 19:25 |